Re: [uClinux-dev] serial port (RS-232) baudrate issue

2011-06-01 Thread Salvatore Frizzoli - IMS Italy
Hi Greg, thank you for the accurate response. We use a Coldfire 5234. I have seen on the Coldfire manual and the uClinux code (kernel 2.6.x). Making some computations, we have seen that our 57600 baudrate is changed by our micro to 57165 bps. In fact, the formula to compute the divisor is:

Re: [uClinux-dev] serial port (RS-232) baudrate issue

2011-06-01 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Salvatore, On 01/06/11 18:14, Salvatore Frizzoli - IMS Italy wrote: thank you for the accurate response. We use a Coldfire 5234. I have seen on the Coldfire manual and the uClinux code (kernel 2.6.x). Making some computations, we have seen that our 57600 baudrate is changed by our micro to

Re: [uClinux-dev] serial port (RS-232) baudrate issue

2011-06-01 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 10:14:19AM +0200, Salvatore Frizzoli - IMS Italy wrote: > thank you for the accurate response. We use a Coldfire 5234. I have > seen on the Coldfire manual and the uClinux code (kernel 2.6.x). > Making some computations, we have seen that our 57600 baudrate is > changed by

[uClinux-dev] Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] m68k: remove duplicate memcpy() implementation

2011-06-01 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Geert, On 26/05/11 16:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 08:23, Greg Ungerer wrote: On 24/05/11 18:06, Andreas Schwab wrote: Geert Uytterhoeven áwrites: What exactly do you mean by "does not support anything less"? It seems it does restrict instruction generation to