On 4/19/2019 6:57 PM, Shriramana Sharma
via Unicode wrote:
I don't know many modern fonts that display 007C
as a broken glyph. In fact I haven't seen a broken line pipe
glyph since the MS-DOS days. Nowadays we have 00A6 for that.
I don't know many modern fonts that display 007C as a broken glyph. In fact
I haven't seen a broken line pipe glyph since the MS-DOS days. Nowadays we
have 00A6 for that.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:30:32 +0100
From: Richard Wordingham
To: Shriramana Sharma
Subject: Re: Latin Script Danda
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:33:35 +0530
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote:
> We are using the pipe character as it is readily available in our
> favou
I cannot; definitely it requires first good knowldge of English (to find
possible synonyms, plus phonetic approximations, including using
abbreviatable words), and Hebrew culture (to guess names and the context).
All this text looks completely random and makes no sense otherwise.
Le mar. 16 avr. 2
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 19:54:47 +0530
Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> Or maybe the Grantha candrabindu can be used, since there is already
> evidence for mixed usage of the scripts and nukta characters have been
> encoded for Tamil usage in the Grantha block for this same reason
> despite Grantha users o
On 4/19/19, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> That reminds me - what if anything is happening about Tamil script
> candrabindu? You reported that U+0310 was being used in that rĂ´le.
I think that there was an idea to add Taml to U+0310's script extensions.
Or maybe the Grantha candrabindu c
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:36:16 +0530
Shriramana Sharma via Unicode wrote:
> On 4/19/19, Richard Wordingham via Unicode
> wrote:
> > That's a fair point. My problem is that someone is claiming of
> > U+0310 that "Somewhere in the Unicode specifications is a footnote
> > saying it is to be used wit
7 matches
Mail list logo