Otto Stolz scripsit:
> Of course, if you allow for
> names comprising several characters, it would be better to spell out the
> multiplication operator; U+22C5, U+2219, U+00B7, and 00D7 coming to mind.
Yes, of course. But that wasn't at all the case I had in mind. Letting x
and y be two rando
John Cowan schrieb:
:Hmm. If you multiply x-bar by y-bar, surely you want the bars to be
:separated, not run together into a single bar (which would be the mean
:of x times y), no? In that case COMBINING MACRON would be better.
:Or should x-bar times y-bar be written with a THIN SPACE separatin
Roozbeh Pournader scripsit:
> I remember seeing an invisible times character somewhere, I think it was
> in 3.2 tables. Would you look?
Yes, at U+2062. But I think that is truly invisible, zero-width, and is
used to render ab meaning a x b.
--
John Cowan [EMA
Roozbeh asked:
> I remember seeing an invisible times character somewhere, I think it was
> in 3.2 tables. Would you look?
U+2062 INVISIBLE TIMES
You can find such things at:
http://www.unicode.org/unicode/alloc/Pipeline.html
and
http://www.unicode.org/charts/draftunicode32/
or in the ISO/I
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, John Cowan wrote:
> Hmm. If you multiply x-bar by y-bar, surely you want the bars to be
> separated, not run together into a single bar (which would be the mean
> of x times y), no? In that case COMBINING MACRON would be better.
> Or should x-bar times y-bar be written wi
Otto Stolz scripsit:
> This is a sequence of two Unicode characters, viz.
> U+0078 LATIN SMALL LETTER X
> U+0305 COMBINING OVERLINE
> Incidentally, the bar (rather than x-bar) signifies the mean; the bar
> could be applied to any name indicating the mean of all and any values
> having that na
Am 2001-03-21 um 18:56 UCT hat Eric Hausen geschrieben:
> Can anyone tell me the character code for the x-bar symbol (mathematical
> mean).
This is a sequence of two Unicode characters, viz.
U+0078 LATIN SMALL LETTER X
U+0305 COMBINING OVERLINE
Incidentally, the bar (rather than x-bar) signi
7 matches
Mail list logo