Re: Fwd: [UC] AGE ON THE LIST -- FINAL

2005-02-10 Thread Jedidiah McKee
0500 > From: Jon Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [UC] AGE ON THE LIST -- FINAL > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > You have an interesting sense of "rarely". Even > without statistics, you are &g

Fwd: [UC] AGE ON THE LIST -- FINAL

2005-02-10 Thread BAShowell
Any other opinions? --- Begin Message --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You have an interesting sense of "rarely". Even without statistics, you are definitely one of the most prolific posters to the group, in my observation. :) Jon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | My age is not something

Re: [UC] AGE ON THE LIST -- FINAL

2005-02-10 Thread BAShowell
My age is not something you should ask, nor need to know. I was always taught that you NEVER ask a woman her age, it shows a lack of respect; next you'll be so disrespectful as to ask her weight. I am probably older than any who have responded, and since I rarely post or respond, I don't know how I

[UC] AGE ON THE LIST -- FINAL

2005-02-08 Thread Benseraglio2
AGE -- NUM=60 AVG=43.4   YEARS IN W PHILLY -- NUM=56 AVG=19.7   FWIW these are the final tallies of ages and years in W. Philly for those who have sent me their data. Note however that of the frequent TOP TEN, I have yet to hear from:   CRAIGSOLVE KRFAPT LASERBEAM BASHOWELL   Until I hear from t