On 01 Dec, 2004, at 13:44, Stephen Fisher wrote:
I think the point here is that Verizon is giving up on Philly to get
the legislation past so that they can set a precedent for the rest of
the country. What company wouldn't want VETO power over city policies
and programs? It's outrageous an
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 10:35
AM
Subject: [UC] MSNBC.com Article: Philly,
Verizon strike WiFi agreement
Philly, Verizon strike WiFi
agreementThe city of Philadelphia and Verizon Communications struck an
agreement Tuesday that would allow the ci
I think the point here is that Verizon is giving up on Philly to get
the legislation past so that they can set a precedent for the rest of
the country. What company wouldn't want VETO power over city policies
and programs? It's outrageous and you should still call the gov, if
it's not to late
On 01 Dec, 2004, at 10:35, Paul Grossman wrote:
Philly, Verizon strike WiFi agreement
The city of Philadelphia and Verizon Communications struck an
agreement Tuesday that would allow the city to provide wireless
Internet access as a municipal service.
http://g.msn.com/0MNBUS00/2?http://www.msnb
Philly, Verizon strike WiFi agreementThe city of
Philadelphia and Verizon Communications struck an agreement Tuesday that would
allow the city to provide wireless Internet access as a municipal service.http://g.msn.com/0MNBUS00/2?http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6622765&&CM=EmailThis&CE=1_