Re: Missing a chance

On 30.08.2016 03:53, Dr. Hawkins wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: If you can think without think, then you sir, are a better man than I. ;-) Also, I can read with both eyes shut. (hmm, probably means nothing to non US folks. It's a very late Dr. Seuss book).

Re: Logic Flow Chart App

I like Dia: http://dia-installer.de/ Richmond. On 29.08.2016 23:29, Bob Sneidar wrote: Hi all. Anyone know of a good logic flow chart editor? I am having difficulty whenever building complex control structures. When I have 3 or 4 conditions that can be true or false, affecting whether or no

Re: Suicide

http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=25742&p=133791&hilit=harakiri#p133783 Regards, Sri -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Suicide-tp4707891p4707941.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Logic Flow Chart App

OmniGraffle was my favorite https://www.omnigroup.com/omnigraffle but others are here... these look cool... SMART DRAW or

Re: Missing a chance

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > If you can think without think, then you sir, are a better man than I. ;-) > Also, I can read with both eyes shut. (hmm, probably means nothing to non US folks. It's a very late Dr. Seuss book). -- Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq. (702) 508-

Re: Problem making standalone in 8.1.0

So is there a way to find what is missing and fix it? I can't find any additional information about what this"module file" is -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Problem-making-standalone-in-8-1-0-tp4707924p4707938.html Sent from the Revolution - Use

Re: Problem making standalone in 8.1.0

so let me ask this... what can I do to move forward? -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Problem-making-standalone-in-8-1-0-tp4707924p4707935.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: Logic Flow Chart App

Hi Bob, Emboldened by others, I submit my non-answer to your question: I usually start at my whiteboard with either traditional flowcharting or Warnier/Orr diagrams, and then go to paper and pencil if I need to drill down very far. If the decision tree is very complex, I'll sometimes put toge

Re: Logic Flow Chart App

I use a pen and paper. It helps me think it through without dealing with yet another piece of software. One client jokingly accused me of drawing cartoons on the job. .Jerry > On Aug 29, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: > > Hi all. > > Anyone know of a good logic flow chart editor? I am

Re: Logic Flow Chart App

Of course the eight cases are A and B and C A and B and not C A and not B and C not A and B and C A and not B and not C not A and B and not C not A and not B and C not A and not B and not C You know: There are three kinds of mathematicians: A first kind is able to count, the second one is not ;-

Re: Logic Flow Chart App

One may look at that as a logic flow chart, the most compact view I know. For example: for booleans A,B,C you have the pairwise disjoint cases (ready for a switch) A and B and C A and B and not C A and not B and C not A and B and C A and not B and not C A and not B and not C not A and B and not C

Re: Logic Flow Chart App

Thanks. Actually what I need is a logic flow diagramming tool. Bob S > On Aug 29, 2016, at 13:56 , hh wrote: > >> Bob S. wrote: >> Anyone know of a good logic flow chart editor? I am having difficulty >> whenever building complex control structures. When I have 3 or 4 >> conditions that can be

Re: Logic Flow Chart App

> Bob S. wrote: > Anyone know of a good logic flow chart editor? I am having difficulty > whenever building complex control structures. When I have 3 or 4 > conditions that can be true or false, affecting whether or not I even > check for conditions further down the line, I get lost pretty quickly.

Logic Flow Chart App

Hi all. Anyone know of a good logic flow chart editor? I am having difficulty whenever building complex control structures. When I have 3 or 4 conditions that can be true or false, affecting whether or not I even check for conditions further down the line, I get lost pretty quickly. If I could

Re: Missing a chance

If you can think without think, then you sir, are a better man than I. ;-) Bob S On Aug 28, 2016, at 09:01 , Dr. Hawkins mailto:doch...@gmail.com>> wrote: And for straight C, I can think of a couple of huge examples without even thinking . . . ___ u

Re: Missing a chance

Thinking even. Bob S On Aug 29, 2016, at 10:17 , Bob Sneidar mailto:bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com>> wrote: If you can think without think, then you sir, are a better man than I. ;-) Bob S On Aug 28, 2016, at 09:01 , Dr. Hawkins mailto:doch...@gmail.com>> wrote: And for straight C, I can thi

Re: [ ANN ] Release 8.1.0 RC-1

I've been getting random CTD on 8.0.2 in El Capitan. I was going to revert to 8.0.1 which seemed very stable to me. I'm sorry for not researching it further. I usually run into the issue while I am using the app in a production environment and I don't have the luxury of troubleshooting inline.

Re: Problem making standalone in 8.1.0

Just one note: As you might hope, if you don't change anything after your first compile, you can switch the auto-select to manually-select, and LC will remember what it was including, previously. So, as you are fiddling and running tests, you should be able to at least run them faster. On Mon, A

Problem making standalone in 8.1.0

I started using 8.1.0RC1... when trying to build an iOS standalone, the "Auto detecting library inclusions" process is taking really long, like 12 minutes. And then... I get an error window that says "could not open module file" and then another error window that says "There was an error while sa

[ANN] This week in LiveCode 48

Hi LiveCoders Read about new developments in LiveCode open source and the open source community in today's edition of the "This Week in LiveCode" newsletter! Read issue #48 here: http://goo.gl/OYgUw3 This is a weekly newsletter about LiveCode, focussing on what'

Re: OT: Images for Mobile

I don’t see why this is OT. It seems absolutely mainstream for cross-platform, multi-device apps, which is to a great extent what LC is about. Jacque’s solution looks good to me in general, although one can imagine sensitive situations where it wouldn’t look quite so good. I have been hoping in