Streaming is out of the question. We just don't have the bandwidth.
But Chipp and I *are* talking about alternatives. We'll have some news in a
day or so.
On 5/22/06, Sivakatirswami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 22, 2006, at 5:45 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> If you want more u
On May 22, 2006, at 5:45 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
Hi Dan,
If you want more unprofessional off the cuff video like last year,
I would be more than happy to do it again.
It worked fine for me... this isn't the oscars!
Sivakatirswami
Maybe Chris and I can do it together. If you are going a
Again,
Does it need to be streaming/live? Or could it survive/have a paying
audience if it were to be audited?
I'm reasonably certain a decent job could be done with editing, etc. As
long as the audio's clear, you can always edit out bad video and
substitute screen shots, bullet points, etc.
I
On May 22, 2006, at 12:46 AM, Dan Shafer wrote:
We have been discussing an alternative way of providing content to
those who
can't attend the conference. It isn't clear yet how or if we will
do that.
Anything we do requires additional effort and since we can't easily
gauge
the demand, we'
That would be great, Dan. Many thanks for your efforts.
Sarah
On 5/22/06, Dan Shafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have been discussing an alternative way of providing content to those who
can't attend the conference. It isn't clear yet how or if we will do that.
Anything we do requires additi
We have been discussing an alternative way of providing content to those who
can't attend the conference. It isn't clear yet how or if we will do that.
Anything we do requires additional effort and since we can't easily gauge
the demand, we're kind of shooting in the dark a bit.
But stay tuned.
On 5/22/06, Dan Shafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At this point we have no plans to videotape any sessions because of the
logistics and deployment issues we ran into last year with almost zero
response from the community.
Audio may happen but video probably won't, at least not predictably and fo
At this point we have no plans to videotape any sessions because of the
logistics and deployment issues we ran into last year with almost zero
response from the community.
Audio may happen but video probably won't, at least not predictably and for
resale.
On 5/21/06, Sivakatirswami <[EMAIL PROTE
I'm interested in this too...
Sorry I won't be there...
I hope someone videos this session for all those who can't come!
Sivakatirswami
On May 18, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Chipp Walters wrote:
Hi Todd,
I use MagicCarpet to manage all my MainStacks and SubStacks (I call
plugins). I know you alrea
Hi Todd,
I use MagicCarpet to manage all my MainStacks and SubStacks (I call
plugins). I know you already have a copy. I'll be talking a bit more about
some of the new things I'm doing with auto-updating architectures at RevCon
and hope to see you there.
Contact me offlist if you need more info
I am using the "splash screen" Architecture for deploying an app. The
splash screen stack checks for updates and then launches the "Main"
stack. This part is all based on Chip's "altSplash" engine.
I want the "Main" stack to manage installing additional stacks and or
files. My current strategy
Hello,
I am using the "splash screen" Architecture for deploying an app. The
splash screen stack checks for updates and then launches the "Main"
stack. This part is all based on Chip's "altSplash" engine.
I want the "Main" stack to manage installing additional stacks and or
files. My cu
12 matches
Mail list logo
