Love the Mars lander analogies :)
On Sep 23, 2012, at 5:39 PM, aaron morton wrote:
>> To put in other words, Cassandra will lock down all tables until all pending
>> flush requests fit in the pending queue.
> This was the first issue I looked at in my Cassandra SF talk
> http://www.datastax.com
> To put in other words, Cassandra will lock down all tables until all pending
> flush requests fit in the pending queue.
This was the first issue I looked at in my Cassandra SF talk
http://www.datastax.com/events/cassandrasummit2012/presentations
I've seen it occur more often with lots-o-second
There were no errors in the log (other than the messages dropped exception
pasted below), and the node does recover. We have only a small number of
secondary indexes (3 in the whole system).
However, I went through the cassandra code, and I believe I've worked through
this problem.
Just to fi
Any errors in the log ?
The node recovers ?
Do you use secondary indexes ? If so check comments for
memtable_flush_queue_size in the yaml. if this value is too low writes may back
up. But I would not expect it to cause dropped messages.
> nodetool info also shows we have over a gig of avail
Thanks for the response.
We are on version 1.1.2. We don't see the MutationStage back up. The dump
from the messages dropped error doesn't show a backup, but also watching
"nodetool tpstats" doesn't show any backup there.
nodetool info also shows we have over a gig of available memory on the
> INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-09-17 06:28:03,839 StatusLogger.java (line 72)
> MemtablePostFlusher 1 5 0
> INFO [ScheduledTasks:1] 2012-09-17 06:28:03,840 StatusLogger.java (line 72)
> FlushWriter 1 5 0
Looks suspiciously like