Thanks Ken for the detailed response.
I suppose I could even use some of the pcs/crm CLI commands then.
Cheers.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 03/16/2016 05:22 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
> > I see following info gets updated in CIB. Can I use this or there is
> better
> >
On 03/16/2016 05:22 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
> I see following info gets updated in CIB. Can I use this or there is better
> way?
>
> crm-debug-origin="peer_update_callback" join="*down*" expected="member">
in_ccm/crmd/join reflect the current state of the node (as known by the
partition that you
I see following info gets updated in CIB. Can I use this or there is better
way?
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Nikhil Utane
wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> Sorry about the long delay. This activity was de-focussed but now it's
> back on track.
>
> One part of question that is still not answered is on
Hi Ken,
Sorry about the long delay. This activity was de-focussed but now it's back
on track.
One part of question that is still not answered is on the newly active
node, how to find out which was the node that went down?
Anything that gets updated in the status section that can be read and
figur
On 01/08/2016 11:13 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
>> I think stickiness will do what you want here. Set a stickiness higher
>> than the original node's preference, and the resource will want to stay
>> where it is.
>
> Not sure I understand this. Stickiness will ensure that resources don't
> move back w
> I think stickiness will do what you want here. Set a stickiness higher
> than the original node's preference, and the resource will want to stay
> where it is.
Not sure I understand this. Stickiness will ensure that resources don't
move back when original node comes back up, isn't it?
But in my
On 01/08/2016 06:55 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
> Would like to validate my final config.
>
> As I mentioned earlier, I will be having (upto) 5 active servers and 1
> standby server.
> The standby server should take up the role of active that went down. Each
> active has some unique configuration that
Would like to validate my final config.
As I mentioned earlier, I will be having (upto) 5 active servers and 1
standby server.
The standby server should take up the role of active that went down. Each
active has some unique configuration that needs to be preserved.
1) So I will create total 5 gro
Hi
Can anybody tell be ,how to configure corosync pacemaker with crmsh for
active -active and N+1redundancy setup for kamailio.
Thanks
Rishin
Disclaimer: This mes
Thanks to you Ken for giving all the pointers.
Yes, I can use service start/stop which should be a lot simpler. Thanks
again. :)
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 12/22/2015 12:17 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
> > I have prepared a write-up explaining my requirements and current
On 12/22/2015 12:17 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
> I have prepared a write-up explaining my requirements and current solution
> that I am proposing based on my understanding so far.
> Kindly let me know if what I am proposing is good or there is a better way
> to achieve the same.
>
> https://drive.goo
I have prepared a write-up explaining my requirements and current solution
that I am proposing based on my understanding so far.
Kindly let me know if what I am proposing is good or there is a better way
to achieve the same.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0zPvL-Tp-JSTEJpcUFTanhsNzQ/view?usp=sha
On 12/03/2015 05:23 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
> Ken,
>
> One more question, if i have to propagate configuration changes between the
> nodes then is cpg (closed process group) the right way?
> For e.g.
> Active Node1 has config A=1, B=2
> Active Node2 has config A=3, B=4
> Standby Node needs to have
Ken,
One more question, if i have to propagate configuration changes between the
nodes then is cpg (closed process group) the right way?
For e.g.
Active Node1 has config A=1, B=2
Active Node2 has config A=3, B=4
Standby Node needs to have configuration for all the nodes such that
whichever goes do
Thank You Ken for such a detailed response. Truly appreciate it. Cheers.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 05:31 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am evaluating whether it is feasible to use Pacemaker + Corosync to add
> > support for clustering/redundan
On 12/01/2015 05:31 AM, Nikhil Utane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am evaluating whether it is feasible to use Pacemaker + Corosync to add
> support for clustering/redundancy into our product.
Most definitely
> Our objectives:
> 1) Support N+1 redundancy. i,e. N Active and (up to) 1 Standby.
You can do th
Hi,
I am evaluating whether it is feasible to use Pacemaker + Corosync to add
support for clustering/redundancy into our product.
Our objectives:
1) Support N+1 redundancy. i,e. N Active and (up to) 1 Standby.
2) Each node has some different configuration parameters.
3) Whenever any active node g
17 matches
Mail list logo