On Thu, March 30, 2006 9:12 pm, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> I saw a message about a new rewritten boot loader on one of the DragonFly
> lists, but for some reason I can't find it now.
>
> Can someone point me to the thread?
I didn't find the thread right off, but searching the source led me to:
http:/
I saw a message about a new rewritten boot loader on one of the DragonFly
lists, but for some reason I can't find it now.
Can someone point me to the thread?
Jeremy C. Reed
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 11:17:00AM -0800, Ben Cadieux wrote:
> Anyone have an idea why Windows and Linux are using the same ID for
> their data partition?
What are you meaning? Linux partitions normally have an ID of 131,
Windows of 7 for NTFS or 11/12 (FAT). Extended partitions have an ID of
15,
Anyone have an idea why Windows and Linux are using the same ID for
their data partition? What's the point in having a much longer
partition type ID if we're going to be overlapping anyway? That
and...could we possibly find a worse way of storing it? "Note that
only the first three blocks are by
