Linuxulator question

2010-09-25 Thread Tim Darby
What's the status of the Linuxulator? I saw that Alex put a lot of work into it, so is it basically done and just needs testers? Thanks, Tim

Re: Linuxulator question

2010-09-25 Thread Alex Hornung
On 25/09/10 15:52, Tim Darby wrote: > What's the status of the Linuxulator? I saw that Alex put a lot of > work into it, so is it basically done and just needs testers? Linuxulator works quite nicely on x86; at least Java works and as far as I know Flash, too. On x86_64 there is no linuxulator at

Linuxulator question, boot loader oddity

2010-11-07 Thread Tim Darby
I'm running 2.8 now and it looks great so far. I setup linuxulator for the first time yesterday as follows: - added linux_load=yes to /boot/loader.conf - added linux_enable=yes to /etc/rc.conf - pkg_radd suse_base - mount -t linprocfs none /usr/pkg/emul/linux/proc Did I miss anything? I've only

Re: Linuxulator question, boot loader oddity

2010-11-07 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Sun, November 7, 2010 8:45 am, Tim Darby wrote: > That's when I noticed that loader.conf looked like > this: > > VFS.ROOT.MOUNTFROM="HAMMER:SERNO/s0a4j1ta141435.S1D" > linux_load=yes > > I tried changing the mountfrom line to: > vfs.root.mountfrom="hammer:serno/S0A4J1TA141435.s1d" I don't know

Re: Linuxulator question, boot loader oddity

2010-11-07 Thread Tim Darby
I'm willing to go with that explanation, lacking a better one. ;-) However, in vi I would have had to accidentally type the sequence g~~, which doesn't seem likely. Tim On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > On Sun, November 7, 2010 8:45 am, Tim Darby wrote: >> That's when