Using PKGSRC to install to non-standard LOCALBASE

2007-06-24 Thread Dave Hayes
If I wanted to build Apache, for example, out of pkgsrc but I wanted it to be installed to a different prefix than LOCALBASE, how would I do that? There's enough warnings about using different values for LOCALBASE that I'd thought I'd check with the more experienced people out there. -- Dave

Re: Using PKGSRC to install to non-standard LOCALBASE

2007-06-24 Thread Justin C. Sherrill
On Sun, June 24, 2007 12:07 pm, Dave Hayes wrote: > If I wanted to build Apache, for example, out of pkgsrc but I wanted > it to be installed to a different prefix than LOCALBASE, how would I > do that? > > There's enough warnings about using different values for LOCALBASE > that I'd thought I'd ch

Re: Using PKGSRC to install to non-standard LOCALBASE

2007-06-25 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 09:07:07AM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: > If I wanted to build Apache, for example, out of pkgsrc but I wanted > it to be installed to a different prefix than LOCALBASE, how would I > do that? The recommented way is to bootstrap to the new prefix and use the bmake from that. Yo

Re: Using PKGSRC to install to non-standard LOCALBASE

2007-06-26 Thread Dave Hayes
Justin C Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It may be possible to do something in a jail or with chroot where you > build a new pkgsrc location with a bootstrap, install to that location, > package up that install, and then use it with your normal pkgsrc install. This appears to be a working

Re: Using PKGSRC to install to non-standard LOCALBASE

2007-06-26 Thread reed
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Dave Hayes wrote: > If I wanted to build Apache, for example, out of pkgsrc but I wanted > it to be installed to a different prefix than LOCALBASE, how would I > do that? > > There's enough warnings about using different values for LOCALBASE > that I'd thought I'd check with

Re: Using PKGSRC to install to non-standard LOCALBASE

2007-06-26 Thread Dave Hayes
reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The "pkgviews" support is supposed to be able to do that also. I have used > it before, but last time I tried it didn't work for me anymore. (I have > read postings from others indicating it does work though.) Thanks for the pointer. I was unable to immediatel