Indeed, I reproduced it, but it looks like to be correct
S(*/*, text/html) = text/html;q=1;qs=1;d=0
S(application/json, application/json) = application/json;q=1;qs=1;d=0
(Section 3.7.2, 3.b)
both methods are equal candidates so the 1st method (or whichever method
from these two gets on top) i
No q, no text/html, this is coming from AngularJS using its default
Accept header.
Jim
On 13/01/2016 13:57, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
On 13/01/16 13:53, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
On 13/01/16 13:05, Jim Talbut wrote:
Gaah
You're right.
Thank you.
I haven't touched this code for a long whi
On 13/01/16 13:53, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi
On 13/01/16 13:05, Jim Talbut wrote:
Gaah
You're right.
Thank you.
I haven't touched this code for a long while and didn't realise I had
overloaded that method (I've now renamed the methods to help me out next
time).
I'm surprised that a reques
Hi
On 13/01/16 13:05, Jim Talbut wrote:
Gaah
You're right.
Thank you.
I haven't touched this code for a long while and didn't realise I had
overloaded that method (I've now renamed the methods to help me out next
time).
I'm surprised that a request with an Accept of this:
application/j
Hi,
CXF add automatically the following "namespaces" to Command_Cryptic and also
creates its prefixes (ns6, ns70...) :
xmlns:ns6="http://xml.afterbit.com/2010/06/Security_v1";
xmlns:ns70="http://xml.afterbit.com/HSFREQ_07_3_1A";
xmlns:ns71="http://xml.afterbit.com/HSFRES_07_3_1A"; >
and i c
Gaah
You're right.
Thank you.
I haven't touched this code for a long while and didn't realise I had
overloaded that method (I've now renamed the methods to help me out next
time).
I'm surprised that a request with an Accept of this:
application/json, text/plain, */*
Preferred this
Hi
The log shows that a method accepting a single parameter is invoked,
while the one you typed accepts 3 parameters.
Looks like you may have 2 methods which prove to be equal JAX-RS method
candidates.
Cheers, Sergey
On 12/01/16 20:09, Jim Talbut wrote:
Hi,
In a JAX-RS application running
Hi
It looks like you'd like to optimize (remove possibly redundant
prefixes) as opposed to change the namespaces, the transformation
feature does not do it, perhaps you can use XSLT feature to drop
namespaces prefixes
Cheers, Sergey
On 12/01/16 16:34, r.bott...@afterbit.com wrote:
Hi,
i use