Hi Roland, Frank,
Thanks very much. This was exactly what I was looking for.
Best,
Jonah
On 15-11-11 04:46 AM, Roland Haas wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> uhh, let me actually read the question. Frank seems to have pointed you
> to what I assume (have not checked yet) to be the proper documentation
> th
Hello all,
uhh, let me actually read the question. Frank seems to have pointed you
to what I assume (have not checked yet) to be the proper documentation
that shows what can go wrong. Now for how I worked around the issues myself:
For the symmetric operators branch I use -fp-model precise to the
Roland, I think you have been using such flags. Which flags exactly did you
use?
-erik
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Frank Loeffler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:38:08PM -0500, Jonah Miller wrote:
> > I am working on developing a modified stencil for the Einstein Toolkit
> > and I am d
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:38:08PM -0500, Jonah Miller wrote:
> I am working on developing a modified stencil for the Einstein Toolkit
> and I am discovering that regression tests pass when I use the GNU
> compilers but fail when I use the Intel compilers, even with gentle
> optimization setting
Hello,
I am working on developing a modified stencil for the Einstein Toolkit
and I am discovering that regression tests pass when I use the GNU
compilers but fail when I use the Intel compilers, even with gentle
optimization settings such as -O1. I suspect over-zealous optimization.
Has anyon