Hi :)
It's ok. I was just curious. It was a bit cheeky of me to ask so there was no
need to answer at all.
Apols and regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sun, 1/4/12, Mark Stanton wrote:
From: Mark Stanton
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Fw: 'Open' Standards dependant on a sing
> I don't suppose you would be willing to copy your answer to this list
> or the marketing list or perhaps to Ian?
I answered online, so I don't have a handy document, or even any document :-(
Mark Stanton
One small step for mankind...
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@glo
Hi :)
I don't suppose you would be willing to copy your answer to this list or the
marketing list or perhaps to Ian?
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Sat, 31/3/12, Mark Stanton wrote:
From: Mark Stanton
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Fw: 'Open' Standards dependant on a single
com
It mentions not getting locked in to one vendor several times. It
seems to me that this is the point that needs to be used, repeatedly,
to avoid, errr, getting locked in to one vendor.
I've responded to the first two chapters, at which point I started to
gibber and couldn't carry on any furthe
Hi :)
I have forwarded a long rambling rant i just sent to the "Open Standards"
agency. Short and sweet might have been better. Please feel free to write
your own or perhaps modify bits of mine. The marketing list had a great post a
few weeks ago from someone in Thailand or Vietnam or somewhe