uette.org) and
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reminding
>>
>>> mailing list subscribers to comply with it.
>>>>
>>>> Among all these points only the last two may relate somewhat more
>>>>>>
>>>>> the
>>
ation and may form a part of
the
thread. We need that. I notice you have managed to start a new
thread
"Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ..." that is not integrated
with
the original thread. This is not correct and you seem to do this
for
each one of your reply.
Below is one p
the concept of mailing list discussion threads. From
my
> > > > perspective it seems you are not familiar with the concept,or that
you
> > > > perhaps have no desire to become acquainted with these notions
which
> > > > would be problematic for a mailing list m
> Le 02.02.2017 01:56, anne-ology a écrit :
>> Do you know what moderation means?
>>
>>
>>moderation := "the avoidance of excess or extremes, especially in
>> one's behavior or political opinions"
>>
>>
>>
>> From: toki
>
; any "cruft from an email. Signs, mentions of date, time,
etc. in an email are part of its information and may form a part of the
thread. We need that. I notice you have managed to start a new thread
"Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ..." that is not integrated with
the origi
Do you know what moderation means?
moderation := "the avoidance of excess or extremes, especially in
one's behavior or political opinions"
From: toki
Date: Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...
To:
Cc: "users@global.li
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...
On 02/01/2017 02:03 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> * If nobody else has responded 48 hours later, then, if able to do so,
>> address the issue(s) in the message;
> ... there is simply no legitimate reason that a moderator should have to
> wa
On Wed Feb 01 2017 14:20:18 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), toki
wrote:
> The theory, supported by research, is that active moderator
> participation, results in a reduction in participation by list members,
> with the highest impact being amongst the low-frequency posters.
Link(s) please?
Re
On Wed Feb 01 2017 00:13:29 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), toki
wrote:
> On 01/31/2017 05:21 PM, anne-ology wrote:
>> well, when I think the list might be interested in what's going on,
>> I cc to the list;
>
> On any of the lists I moderate, or used to moderate, doing that would
> get me off
e: Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Hello Tom,
It seems that the problem Brian highlighted is a bit different and is a
recurring one. Anne-ology does not seem to understand her exact role as a
list moderator, even
well, when I think the list might be interested in what's going on,
I cc to the list;
in that way all have the chance to be informed.
From: toki
Date: Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
On
s E Lang
Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] in response ...
To: anne-ology
The tool you use to send email replies does not create References or
In-Reply-To headers. That is what breaks threads. The best email tools use
those headers to create a hierarchical vi
Hello Tom,
It seems that the problem Brian highlighted is a bit different and is a
recurring one. Anne-ology does not seem to understand her exact role as
a list moderator, even after years of being in that position. What she
has to do is first to approve the message so that it can reach the
Hi :)
It is not always possible to "do the right thing" so it is good that
Anne-ology was able to "handle it" with courteous intelligence. Clearly
no-one else had figured out how to deal with it as it had been languishing
so long. So it is good that she was able "to go the extra mile". :)
So, A
14 matches
Mail list logo
