Hi there,One of the features of version 1.2.11.6 that caught my eye was the ability to enable/disable replication agreements. I've installed a copy on one of my lab machines, install went on flawlessly, but I seem to be unable to find where to apply the nsds5ReplicaEnabled attribute. I've tried
On 06/25/2012 12:24 AM, Larry wrote:
On
06/25/2012 12:21 AM, JD wrote:
fc16 with latest updates.
Pinging my gateway:
$ ping 192.168.42.129
ping: icmp open socket: Operation not permitted
On 6/25/2012 8:25 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 5/21/2012 5:48 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2012-05-20 at 11:35 -0700, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I am having problems with is expecting to see new additions from
iptables logging rejections and not getting them until much later,
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:14:34 -0700, Brian Mury wrote:
On 6/24/2012 10:17 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
It only affects those packages if you don't know about running
yum --skip-broken update yet. If you disagree, post the Yum output.
--skip-broken doesn't work for the broken redhat-lsb
On 06/26/2012 01:32 AM, JD wrote:
On 06/25/2012 12:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/25/2012 02:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Actually.strike all that. Or at least most of it. Need to
rethink...
OK *NOW* I do have it
The correct command is getcap
root@f17 tmp]# getcap
On 06/25/2012 01:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
--skip-broken tends generally to fail on multilib in a way that
it pulls i686 deps if they seem to satisfy deps by version
on a pure x86_64 system as long you do not exclude=*.i686
I'm not sure that that's --skip-broken's fault; it sounds more like
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:12:50 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
--skip-broken tends generally to fail on multilib in a way that
it pulls i686 deps if they seem to satisfy deps by version
on a pure x86_64 system as long you do not exclude=*.i686
That's something different and the reason why packagers
Ed Greshko wrote:
Now all you have to do is, since you've overwritten everything, is to sit
around and
scratch your head and ask. Was the sha256sum correct before I
reinstalled? Was
that ping command the real ping or was it dropped in by nefarious means?.
It would have been
On 25 June 2012 16:05, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:45:15 +0100
Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, has anyone else seen this? Since installing F17 (probably the
first clean fedora install I've done since single digits), I get a
Am 25.06.2012 22:32, schrieb Joe Zeff:
On 06/25/2012 01:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
--skip-broken tends generally to fail on multilib in a way that
it pulls i686 deps if they seem to satisfy deps by version
on a pure x86_64 system as long you do not exclude=*.i686
I'm not sure that that's
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 22:57:41 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.06.2012 22:32, schrieb Joe Zeff:
On 06/25/2012 01:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
--skip-broken tends generally to fail on multilib in a way that
it pulls i686 deps if they seem to satisfy deps by version
on a pure x86_64
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 13:32:13 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/25/2012 01:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
--skip-broken tends generally to fail on multilib in a way that
it pulls i686 deps if they seem to satisfy deps by version
on a pure x86_64 system as long you do not exclude=*.i686
I'm not
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 23:44 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.06.2012 23:42, schrieb Robert G. (Doc) Savage:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/bin/qpid-python-test from install of
python-qpid-0.16-1.fc17.noarch conflicts with file from package
python-qpid-qmf-0.14-1.fc17.2.x86_64
Hi, I in danger of making this a rant, but is XDMCP no longer something
that Fedora supports?
I have just installed F17 x64 in a VM to tinker with it and systemd and
I'd like to enable XDMCP. Or what is the favoured remote access method
these days.
I've put DisallowTCP=0 in the [security]
On 6/25/2012 9:18 AM, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 11:51 -0500, D Wyatt wrote:
I looked for an online archive to check, but failed to find anything
more recent than 2010.
This link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users (in
all the message footers), leads to this link
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Greg Woods wo...@ucar.edu wrote:
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 13:09 -0400, Natalie Gross wrote:
Now it works if I bring it up manually via systemctl restart
network.service.
But it (network) does not start automatically at boot. And I don't
have that network
I have created a USB installer for the FC16 DVD ISO image via the
livecd-iso-to-disk tool, as detailed on the Fedora wiki. I also included
the appropriate repo=hd:device:/path/file boot parameter to the kernel
command-line, as the wiki states that for all releases prior to FC17 this
must be
On 06/25/2012 02:14 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/26/2012 01:32 AM, JD wrote:
On 06/25/2012 12:59 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/25/2012 02:47 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Actually.strike all that. Or at least most of it. Need to
rethink...
OK *NOW* I do have it
The correct
18 matches
Mail list logo
