On 6. 6. 2014 at 16:56:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 14:46 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Hello,
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
have got recently in Yum? Or
On 6. 6. 2014 at 09:20:33, Luke Nath wrote:
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:46:23 +0200
From: akozu...@redhat.com
To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org; yum-de...@lists.baseurl.org;
users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Save everybody some surprises in
Fedora 22!
Hello,
The time when DNF
On 7. 6. 2014 at 13:08:42, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Sudhir Khanger wrote:
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they have
got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've put together a very
On 06/09/2014 12:48 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Nope, yumex has only a very little to do with yum, it's a separate project.
You can use PackageKit or the GNOME software center which will both soon
use the same underlying libraries dnf uses.
And what do I use if I don't use Gnome but want a GUI?
--
On 8. 6. 2014 at 09:45:44, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/06/14 20:46, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
have got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've put
On 06/09/14 15:59, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 8. 6. 2014 at 09:45:44, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/06/14 20:46, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
have got recently in Yum? Or
On 9. 6. 2014 at 00:58:31, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/09/2014 12:48 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Nope, yumex has only a very little to do with yum, it's a separate
project.
You can use PackageKit or the GNOME software center which will both soon
use the same underlying libraries dnf uses.
And what
On 06/08/2014 02:02 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
For me, the essential properties of yum are simplicity and reliability.
Thanks Timothy for bringing this up. The focus in DNF development is on
those priorities just as much as on speed. Users experience very little
problems with the stable
On 8 June 2014 23:40, David dgbo...@gmail.com wrote:
It took a while but I remembered that from school. But I admit that I
had to Google search it for reference.
So? The people here are, mostly, ordinary people that try to help
people with problems. Insulting *paid help* is just stupid.
On 8 June 2014 22:54, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
I'd have the file in 20 minutes or so. The estimate was 4 1/2 hours! I said to
go ahead, and then after about 2 1/2 hours I accidentally aborted it. I'll try
again late tonite.
Hi Doug. Good to hear from you again.
If you are using
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:59:15AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
till October) will give folks plenty of time to hone their dnf skills.
IMO, for many (majority?) it will be a drop-in replacement for yum.
Yes, that's the plan. There are some differences but they are all well
documented.
Is the
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:14:01PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
dnf erase kernel deletes all packages called kernel
I think this and the protected-packages behavior in general is important to
carry forward.
--
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora Project Leader
--
users mailing list
On 06/09/14 20:30, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:14:01PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
dnf erase kernel deletes all packages called kernel
I think this and the protected-packages behavior in general is important to
carry forward.
Make sure you make your opinion known here.
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
have got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've put together a
very short and simple survey. Let your opinion be heard!
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 08:30:01 -0400 Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:59:15AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
till October) will give folks plenty of time to hone their dnf skills.
IMO, for many (majority?) it will be a drop-in replacement for yum.
Yes,
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:06:32PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
dnf erase kernel deletes all packages called kernel
I think this and the protected-packages behavior in general is important to
carry forward.
Make sure you make your opinion known here.
On 06/09/14 21:47, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:06:32PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
dnf erase kernel deletes all packages called kernel
I think this and the protected-packages behavior in general is important to
carry forward.
Make sure you make your opinion known here.
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:03:06PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
I did, although I suppose I can vote more than once if it helps. :)
Yes. But make sure you use an assumed name. :-)
For the record, I'm not actually voting more than once. :)
--
Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org
Fedora
On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 17:49 -0400, David wrote:
Use a torrent download (the same site has torrent versions). It's
likely
to be faster, not to mention easier to restart partial downloads.
poc
His complaint was that his download did not complete. A torrent would
be
a complete
I'm using version 0.3.11 and the proxy options are not used when update,
install, etc.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 09:45 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 6. 6. 2014 at 16:56:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 14:46 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Hello,
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 00:58 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 06/09/2014 12:48 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Nope, yumex has only a very little to do with yum, it's a separate project.
You can use PackageKit or the GNOME software center which will both soon
use the same underlying libraries dnf uses.
On 06/09/2014 02:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:59:15AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
till October) will give folks plenty of time to hone their dnf skills.
IMO, for many (majority?) it will be a drop-in replacement for yum.
Yes, that's the plan. There are some differences
I appear to have the same problem on one of my Fedora 20 machines. Was
this ever solved ?
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Steven Stern
subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote:
On 05/30/2013 11:41 AM, staticsafe wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:35:00AM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
F18...
On 9 June 2014 15:41, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
1. Is there a yum compatibility test suite? It dnf is supposed to be a
drop-in replacement, not having one would seem grossly silly and should be
treated as full stop show stopper.
From someone that's had to work with the yum API
On 9. 6. 2014 at 16:41:59, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/09/2014 02:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:59:15AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
till October) will give folks plenty of time to hone their dnf skills.
IMO, for many (majority?) it will be a drop-in replacement for
On 06/09/2014 05:00 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 9 June 2014 15:41, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
1. Is there a yum compatibility test suite? It dnf is supposed to be a
drop-in replacement, not having one would seem grossly silly and should be
treated as full stop show stopper.
On 06/09/2014 04:15 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they
have got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've put together a
very short and simple survey. Let your
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Hello,
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing.
We're wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF
that they have got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've
put together a very
Jonathan Dieter jdieter at lesbg.com writes:
The list of missing yum options is both outdated and incomplete. For
example, it's missing includepkgs (a repository option), for people who
need to access specific packages from non-Fedora compatible repos. On the
other hand, it includes
On 06/07/14 12:19, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
Those of us who have to consider usage are willing to wait for the
rpm rebuilding process
Don't think you can speak for all of us. I don't prefer to wait at all
and want the
On 06/09/2014 09:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It appears fromhttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF
that everyone will have to start writing dnf install ..., which (if
true) invalidates a vast amount of existing documentation and scripts.
alias dnf=yum
HTH, HAND.
--
On 06/07/14 20:07, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/08/14 10:15, don fisher wrote:
All of the configuration files have changed from my previous version (I think
it is F17). Is there documentation on how to set up acpi? Is there
documentation of all of these other changes? I am command line orientated
On 06/10/14 03:30, don fisher wrote:
Thanks for getting back. I receive a message from one of my older apps asking
if I have loaded the 'battery' module. The only documentation I see for acpid
does not go into how to configure for different modules. I looked under
/etc/acpi and co mention
Hi,
I had a look at dnf yesterday for the first time, I didn't know it
existed until this thread. I have a query with its functionality that
I'm not sure is an issue or whether its just the package manager I
normally use that is being user friendly or doing things differently.
I have
On 06/09/2014 05:48 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 6. 6. 2014 at 09:20:33, Luke Nath wrote:
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 14:46:23 +0200
From: akozu...@redhat.com
To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org; yum-de...@lists.baseurl.org;
users@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Save everybody some surprises in
Fedora 22!
On 06/09/2014 05:45 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 6. 6. 2014 at 16:56:18, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 14:46 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Hello,
The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're
wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF
Hi,
I have just configured Plymouth is install a graphical theme into
the initrd. I specified that I wanted the 'Solar Flares' theme to be
used, which correctly gets used at shutdown, but at start up the 'Solar
Flares' theme is not used, instead the 'Hotdog' theme is used. Is this a
bug
On 06/09/2014 07:50 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 06/07/14 12:19, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA
Those of us who have to consider usage are willing to wait for the
rpm rebuilding process
Don't think you can
On 06/10/14 05:16, Stephen Morris wrote:
Is PackageKit the only option for a kde user or is there something else which
could be used, like for example Smartpm?
KDE's package management is apper
--
Do not condemn the judgment of another because it differs from your own. You
may both be
On 06/09/2014 05:49 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 9. 6. 2014 at 16:41:59, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 06/09/2014 02:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:59:15AM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
till October) will give folks plenty of time to hone their dnf skills.
IMO, for many (majority?)
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
Why not Vote for yum vs dnf?
What exactly is wrong with yum?
It has worked faultlessly and painlessly for me for years,
with addons to deal with every conceivable problem.
If there is some problem with it,
why not simply
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us wrote:
On 06/09/2014 12:48 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
Nope, yumex has only a very little to do with yum, it's a separate
project.
You can use PackageKit or the GNOME software center which will both soon
use the same underlying libraries dnf
On 06/07/14 20:07, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 06/08/14 10:15, don fisher wrote:
All of the configuration files have changed from my previous version (I think
it is F17). Is there documentation on how to set up acpi? Is there
documentation of all of these other changes? I am command line orientated
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we vote for features we want removed, like multilib? (Actually I guess
that is an rpm abomination, not a yum abomination, but it still ought
to be removed and all the rpms properly split into noarch, i686, and
x86_64
I've been using DNF for a year or so primarily. The one gripe that I
have is that DNF tends to avoid giving useful information with broken
packages. A required package version isn't available? Yum will print
out tons of information on which package failed, what version is
installed, and what
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 15:25:33 -0700
T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
which
requires multilib i686 bits
Properly split up rpms wouldn't require multilib. The
abomination that is multilib introduces utter confusion
by allowing 32 and 64 bit versions of rpms to both be
installed when both claim to include
Stephen Morris writes:
Hi,
I have just configured Plymouth is install a graphical theme into the
initrd. I specified that I wanted the 'Solar Flares' theme to be used, which
correctly gets used at shutdown, but at start up the 'Solar Flares' theme is
not used, instead the 'Hotdog'
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:27:18PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Stephen Morris writes:
Hi,
I have just configured Plymouth is install a graphical theme into the
initrd. I specified that I wanted the 'Solar Flares' theme to be used,
which correctly gets used at shutdown, but at start up
On Jun 5, 2014, at 5:04 AM, Gary Stainburn gary.stainb...@ringways.co.uk
wrote:
The install has succeeded but when I reboot I get the following:
Booting 'Fedora, with Linux 3.9.5-301.fc19.x86_64'
error: failure reading sector 0xfc from 'hd1'.
error: failure reading sector 0xe0
On 10/06/14 03:27, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Stephen Morris writes:
Hi,
I have just configured Plymouth is install a graphical theme into
the initrd. I specified that I wanted the 'Solar Flares' theme to be
used, which correctly gets used at shutdown, but at start up the
'Solar Flares' theme
51 matches
Mail list logo
