On 29 October 2013 04:47, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 22:55 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
I don't know it is a correct design in that case. FF doesn't check
file content and only trusts that HTTP headers are set correctly. But
it is FF and not Fedora
On 29.10.2013 09:17, Ian Malone wrote:
On 29 October 2013 04:47, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 22:55 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
I don't know it is a correct design in that case. FF doesn't check
file content and only trusts that HTTP headers are set
On 29 October 2013 09:07, Mateusz Marzantowicz
mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
On 29.10.2013 09:17, Ian Malone wrote:
On 29 October 2013 04:47, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
There are any number of different types of files
(function-wise) that are the same file-type
On 29 October 2013 10:36, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
As Tim pointed out even just for text you can't trivially tell whether
it should be interpreted as plain text, html, svg, C etc. without
trying to do complex parsing. There is *not* a need for content
detection if the server is
Tim:
For one thing, it's why Windows is so vulnerable. Nasty stuff
bypasses sensible handling, and is allowed to execute, because
that's what Windows does with binary program files (it executes
them).
Ian Malone:
This isn't an argument for using content type rather than
autodetection, the
Am 28.10.2013 21:53, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 21:36, Reindl Harald wrote:
Part of my FF config regarding file associacion is genuine and was never
modified. I know I can change this or that, but appropriate entries are
there ane still don't work correctly.
It happens
Am 28.10.2013 22:22, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 22:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
so at least provide a sample URL
Here you go:
https://github.com/gammu/gsm-docs/blob/master/standards/3gpp/TP-24/23040-009.doc?raw=true
here you go: text/plain (last line of the wget-output)
Am 28.10.2013 22:58, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 22:34, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.10.2013 22:22, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 22:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
so at least provide a sample URL
Here you go:
Am 28.10.2013 23:26, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 23:02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.10.2013 22:58, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 22:34, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.10.2013 22:22, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 22:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
so at
Am 29.10.2013 10:07, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 29.10.2013 09:17, Ian Malone wrote:
This isn't an argument for using content type rather than
autodetection, the content type could be manipulated as part of an
attack.
in that case you are already lost and if the server
had an intrusion
Am 29.10.2013 13:30, schrieb Ian Malone:
On 29 October 2013 10:36, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
As Tim pointed out even just for text you can't trivially tell whether
it should be interpreted as plain text, html, svg, C etc. without
trying to do complex parsing. There is *not* a
On 29.10.2013 13:40, Reindl Harald wrote:
the main question is why someone is starting a thread blaming Firefox
because a broken website and insist in blame Firefox while it was
multiple times explained how the www works and why Linux does handle
htings not the same crippeled way like
Why, Firefox on Fedora 19 wants to open all different sort of files of
well known types with gedit? It's ridiculous that torrent files, zip and
gz archives and even doc file are suggested to be opened with gedit.
Creating new FF profile doesn't resolve this issue. Is it that hard to
recognize
Mateusz Marzantowicz writes:
Why, Firefox on Fedora 19 wants to open all different sort of files of
well known types with gedit?
Dunno. Mine doesn't.
It's ridiculous that torrent files, zip and
gz archives and even doc file are suggested to be opened with gedit.
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Why, Firefox on Fedora 19 wants to open all different sort of files of
well known types with gedit? It's ridiculous that torrent files, zip and
gz archives and even doc file are suggested to be opened with gedit.
Creating new FF profile doesn't resolve this issue. Is
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Mateusz Marzantowicz writes:
Any way to fix it?
I'm sure there is. But unless you expect someone to hack into your machine,
and figure out what your problem is, the only one who can fix this would be
you.
Michael Cronenworth had a better
On 28.10.2013 16:35, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Why, Firefox on Fedora 19 wants to open all different sort of files of
well known types with gedit? It's ridiculous that torrent files, zip and
gz archives and even doc file are suggested to be opened with gedit.
Am 28.10.2013 21:30, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 16:35, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Why, Firefox on Fedora 19 wants to open all different sort of files of
well known types with gedit? It's ridiculous that torrent files, zip and
gz archives and even
On 28.10.2013 21:36, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.10.2013 21:30, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 16:35, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Why, Firefox on Fedora 19 wants to open all different sort of files of
well known types with gedit? It's ridiculous that
On 28.10.2013 22:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
so at least provide a sample URL
Here you go:
https://github.com/gammu/gsm-docs/blob/master/standards/3gpp/TP-24/23040-009.doc?raw=true
Mateusz Marzantowicz
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
for me that comes up with asking to save or open with gedit..
although, i assume there's a config attribute to point to the app i'd
like to have open the file... i'm running ff24..
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
On 28.10.2013 22:14,
On 28/10/13 22:22, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 28.10.2013 22:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
so at least provide a sample URL
Here you go:
https://github.com/gammu/gsm-docs/blob/master/standards/3gpp/TP-24/23040-009.doc?raw=true
Whether you like it or not FF doesn't recognise doc files
On 28.10.2013 22:44, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
On 28/10/13 22:22, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 28.10.2013 22:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
so at least provide a sample URL
Here you go:
https://github.com/gammu/gsm-docs/blob/master/standards/3gpp/TP-24/23040-009.doc?raw=true
Whether you like
On 28.10.2013 22:34, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.10.2013 22:22, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 22:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
so at least provide a sample URL
Here you go:
https://github.com/gammu/gsm-docs/blob/master/standards/3gpp/TP-24/23040-009.doc?raw=true
here you
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
I don't know it is a correct design in that case. FF doesn't check file
content and only trusts that HTTP headers are set correctly. But it is
FF and not Fedora issue anymore.
Sometimes that is what one wants, e.g. an HTML or postscript file.
On 28.10.2013 23:02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.10.2013 22:58, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 22:34, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.10.2013 22:22, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
On 28.10.2013 22:14, Reindl Harald wrote:
so at least provide a sample URL
Here you go:
On 28 October 2013 22:26, Mateusz Marzantowicz
mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
On 28.10.2013 23:02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 28.10.2013 22:58, schrieb Mateusz Marzantowicz:
Thank you for your help. It means that content of downloaded file is
irrelevant for FF.
*otherwise* it would be a
On 10/28/2013 02:22 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Here you go:
https://github.com/gammu/gsm-docs/blob/master/standards/3gpp/TP-24/23040-009.doc?raw=true
I use Xfce, and it wanted to use Leafpad because it was described as a
plain-text document.
--
users mailing list
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 22:55 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
I don't know it is a correct design in that case. FF doesn't check
file content and only trusts that HTTP headers are set correctly. But
it is FF and not Fedora issue anymore.
And that is how they're supposed to work, and how it
On Monday, October 28, 2013 10:43:14 PM Ian Malone wrote:
In some of those cases it may simply be unlabelled. But I do find it
pretty annoying when it happens too, seems quite common for email
attachments from Outlook users, you ask to be sent a plain text file
and when you get it you end up
30 matches
Mail list logo
