Hi,
I wonder if that's a bug or by design.
Expression returned by Ast.Action.Operator(Operators.NotEquals,
Ast.Null(), Ast.Null()) [which I believe is equivalent to null !=
null] evaluates to True, though False could be expected (overriding
MakeRule for this special case does the trick).
Having
Hi Curt,
thanks, but I am not allowed to install FePy on the Production-Server. So I
need a solution with pure IronPython ;-).
Regards
Bernd
2008/3/26, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Bernd Viehmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How can i use
2008/3/26, Paul Turbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It seems that whilst serializing .NET classes is trivial, and serializing
> python classes is trivial, serializing something that touches both is
> proving quite difficult.
>
> Any further suggestions gratefully received!
I suggest using copy_reg to
I was thinking that Python's lack of a global namespace for classes would be
a problem -- but of course it's not because you'd actually be looking in the
CLR namespace. So you could just fail the deserialize if the CLR base class
doesn't already exist.
It would still be nice to be able to auto-lo
My guess is you'd restrict it only to .NET objects which are marked as being
serializable. Then you'd ask the object to serialize it's self and then stuff
that into the pickle stream along w/ the extra Python info. That's probably
include a type name which you'd just load and see what you got
Ooh, I was unaware of __reduce__ and __reduce_ex__; thanks.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Dino Viehland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't think what you want will work. If it's your .NET
> class you could implement __reduce_ex__ and I think we'd pick it up and use
> that fo
Unfortunately I don't think what you want will work. If it's your .NET class
you could implement __reduce_ex__ and I think we'd pick it up and use that for
the serialization. But if it's some arbitrary framework class then you'll run
into trouble. On IronPython 2.0 you could have an extension
This is an interesting problem. Python's pickle writes out enough data to
rebuild the object entirely -- including the class definition, if the object
is a user-defined type. How do you accurately write out a class definition
for a C# base class? Would you restrict it to strongly named classes?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Bernd Viehmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How can i use the copy-module-functionality in ipy?
Have you tried just using the py files that ship with CPython?
You can get a distribution of IronPython that incorporates these files
from Seo's FePy project at http:
Hi,
i am news to this list, so let me give a short introduction of myself.
My name is Bernd from Aachen in Germany (near the border to Netherlands and
Belgium) and I am working with python for some time now. In the moment i am
shifting some of my old python-scripts into ironpython because the "no
2008/3/26, Duncan Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File httplib, line unknown, in getreply
> File httplib, line unknown, in getresponse
> File httplib, line unknown, in __init__
> File System, line unknown, in set_ReceiveBufferSize
> File System, line un
Hi,
Motivated by the talks at PyCon I've started looking at ironPython.
I've been trying to get some code that uses xmlrpclib working, but
get:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File httplib, line unknown, in getreply
File httplib, line unknown, in getresponse
File httplib, line unknown, in
Thanks Michael for the advice. Must appreciated. Unfortunately I hasn't
worked out yet tho :(
I can use pickle from C# using Evaluate, or from within a Python class,
on a "pure" Python object. However any attempt at pickling a python
object that derives from a C# base result in an exception li
13 matches
Mail list logo
