Dear Giovanni,
I have followed the same method suggested by you. Still, there is no
change. I got the same band pattern as earlier.
Thanking You.
Sushant
> nbnd=20 corresponds exactly to twice the number of occupied bands in the
> NSoC case,
> because you have 4 P atoms times 5 electrons.
It should work, although I think that it is simpler to do the same inside
the code. Note that closing and re-opening files at each step implies a lot
of I/O
Paolo
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Majewski,Allen R wrote:
> Understood, thanks.
>
> I thought about it more last
The best way to convert cif to pwinput is using a program called gdis. Google
gdis and you will find simple instructions to clone an snv repository. Once you
compile gdis, you simply run the command
you@machine > gdis copy whatever.cif whatever.pwi
This creates a starter input file called
Hi all,
just for clarification ,
what does projected density of states actually calculate, is it overlap
between kohn-sham orbital with the orbital consier in pseudo potential or
something else, can anybody please explain this in detail.
Thanks in advance ,
Regards,
Rita
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016
Understood, thanks.
I thought about it more last night. What if I wrote a script to do this
sequentially on-the-fly, by stepping md forward by 1, and stopping to run other
jobs... for example (pseudocode)
while True:
do_md_calculation(Nstep=1, restart_mode="restart", prefix="my_prefix")
do
Dear Ari,
You was rigth. I used ''crystal_b'' instead of "tpiba_b" and got correct band
gap about 1.3 meV. Thanks a lot.
04.11.2016, 23:32, "Ari P Seitsonen" :
> Dear Andrey,
>
> You are using units 2pi/a ("tpiba_b"), at least in crystal coordinates
> ("crystal_b") it
I think that the option "pw2casino" allows to save wavefunctions at each
step, in the format suitable for QMC code "casino". One might follow that
example.
Paolo
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Lorenzo Paulatto <
lorenzo.paula...@impmc.upmc.fr> wrote:
> Hello,
> It is not already implemented,
You shouldn't use symmetry in MD simulations: set nosym=.true.
Paolo
On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Allen Majewski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> pw.x halted with this error during an md calculation, just after the
> first set of new atomic positions was printed.
>
> Curiously, the
Hello,
It is not already implemented, it would take some coding and testing. It
would also produce a huge amount of data.
Keep in mind that pw.x does Born Oppenheimer MD, hence if you are only
interested in the wavefunctions of some intermediate steps, you can compute
those atomic configurations