On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 14:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jason,
>
> While I commiserate, the best way I have found to avoid placing myself
> in a puerile light is to address these kinds of concerns by saying
> nothing while continuing to work for a solution to my customers needs.
I code as we sp
Jason,
While I commiserate, the best way I have found to avoid placing myself
in a puerile light is to address these kinds of concerns by saying
nothing while continuing to work for a solution to my customers needs.
-Jan
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 07:10, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Jason, take a pill...
The guy asked a simple question, and expected a simple answer...
I don't think anyone here thought you where to blame and everyone
understands that this is a work in progress and there are questions to
be asked. The work has been extensive and fairly good so far.
Frankly th
Also,
On Thursday 10 June 2004 01:18, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Brett and many others busted
> their asses to get the release out
Sure they have. But I don't know why you are so sensistive.
1. Not by any measures of AI could one possibly claim that Maven has an
intelligence.
2. I didn't insinua
On Thursday 10 June 2004 01:18, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Have some respect, phrase your concerns in a
> non-puerile fashion or expect to get little or no help.
For the record; I don't expect to get any help...
Have Fun
Niclas
--
+--//---+
/ http://www.bali.ac/
/ h
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 07:10, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cv]$ maven xdoc
> __ __
> | \/ |__ _Apache__ ___
> | |\/| / _` \ V / -_) ' \ ~ not so intelligent? ~
> |_| |_\__,_|\_/\___|_||_| v. 1.0-rc3
>
> Attempting to download maven-1.0-rc2.jar.
>
On Thursday 10 June 2004 00:34, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Do you rebuild all your apps when a new jdk is release?
I hope your logic ain't this flawed in code :o)
I don't have any applications that come bundled in the JDK download !!!
But I'm pretty sure none of the JDK subsystems would require a
- Original Message -
From: "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Maven Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: RC3 not so intelligent??
> On Wednesday 09 June 2004 20:06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
&
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 20:06, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> A plugin uses the rc2 as dependency.
The only plugins I have are the one that came with the RC3 download, I did a
complete removal of the ~/.mave/plugins prior to running Maven.
Jorg says it is the Artifact plugin, and to me it is a sig
Niclas Hedhman wrote on Wednesday, June 09, 2004 1:10 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cv]$ maven xdoc
> __ __
>> \/ |__ _Apache__ ___
>>> \/| / _` \ V / -_) ' \ ~ not so intelligent? ~
>> _| |_\__,_|\_/\___|_||_| v. 1.0-rc3
>
> Attempting to download maven-1.0-rc2.jar.
> ..
- Original Message -
From: "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 1:10 PM
Subject: RC3 not so intelligent??
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] cv]$ maven xdoc
> __ __
> | \/ |__ _Apache__ ___
> | |\/| / _` \ V / -_) ' \ ~ not so intelligent?
Hi!
I think that it is mentioned in dependencies.
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 19:10:26 +0800, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cv]$ maven xdoc
__ __
| \/ |__ _Apache__ ___
| |\/| / _` \ V / -_) ' \ ~ not so intelligent? ~
|_| |_\__,_|\_/\___|_||_| v. 1.0-rc3
Attempting t
12 matches
Mail list logo
