[ovirt-users] Recommended setup for a FC based storage domain

2014-06-01 Thread combuster
Hi, I have a 4 node cluster setup and my storage options right now are a FC based storage, one partition per node on a local drive (~200GB each) and a NFS based NAS device. I want to setup export and ISO domain on the NAS and there are no issues or questions regarding those two. I wasn't aware

Re: [ovirt-users] Recommended setup for a FC based storage domain

2014-06-01 Thread combuster
I need to scratch gluster off because setup is based on CentOS 6.5, so essential prerequisites like qemu 1.3 and libvirt 1.0.1 are not met. Any info regarding FC storage domain would be appreciated though. Thanks Ivan On Sunday, 1. June 2014. 11.44.33 combus...@archlinux.us wrote: > Hi, > > I

Re: [ovirt-users] Recommended setup for a FC based storage domain

2014-06-02 Thread combuster
One word of caution so far, when exporting any vm, the node that acts as SPM is stressed out to the max. I releived the stress by a certain margin with lowering libvirtd and vdsm log levels to WARNING. That shortened out the export procedure by at least five times. But vdsm process on the SPM no

Re: [ovirt-users] VM HostedEngie is down. Exist message: internal error Failed to acquire lock error -243

2014-06-05 Thread combuster
Hi Andrew, this is something that I saw in my logs too, first on one node and then on the other three. When that happend on all four of them, engine was corrupted beyond repair. First of all, I think that message is saying that sanlock can't get a lock on the shared storage that you defined

Re: [ovirt-users] VM HostedEngie is down. Exist message: internal error Failed to acquire lock error -243

2014-06-05 Thread combuster
gration, then things went all to ... My strong recommendation is not to use self hosted engine feature for production purposes untill the mentioned bug is resolved. But it would really help to hear someone from the dev team on this one. Thanks, Andrew On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:20 PM, combuste

Re: [ovirt-users] VM HostedEngie is down. Exist message: internal error Failed to acquire lock error -243

2014-06-05 Thread combuster
It was all working except that log message :( Thanks, Andrew On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:20 PM, combuster wrote: Hi Andrew, this is something that I saw in my logs too, first on one node and then on the other three. When that happend on all four of them, engine was corrupted beyond repair. Fi

Re: [ovirt-users] Recommended setup for a FC based storage domain

2014-06-09 Thread combuster
OK, I have good news and bad news :) Good news is that I can run different VM's on different nodes when all of their drives are on FC Storage domain. I don't think that all of I/O is running through SPM, but I need to test that. Simply put, for every virtual disk that you create on the shared

Re: [ovirt-users] Recommended setup for a FC based storage domain

2014-06-09 Thread combuster
Bad news happens only when running a VM for the first time, if it helps... On 06/09/2014 01:30 PM, combuster wrote: OK, I have good news and bad news :) Good news is that I can run different VM's on different nodes when all of their drives are on FC Storage domain. I don't think t

Re: [ovirt-users] VM HostedEngie is down. Exist message: internal error Failed to acquire lock error -243

2014-06-09 Thread combuster
ded it in reproduce steps. If you know another steps to reproduce this error, without blocking connection to storage it also can be wonderful if you can provide them. Thanks - Original Message - From: "Andrew Lau" To: "combuster" Cc: "users" Sent: Monday, Jun

Re: [ovirt-users] Recommended setup for a FC based storage domain

2014-06-09 Thread combuster
his at the time of the virtual disk creation in case I have selected to run from the specific node? On 06/09/2014 01:49 PM, combuster wrote: Bad news happens only when running a VM for the first time, if it helps... On 06/09/2014 01:30 PM, combuster wrote: OK, I have good news and bad news :

Re: [ovirt-users] VM HostedEngie is down. Exist message: internal error Failed to acquire lock error -243

2014-06-09 Thread combuster
, for 15 years I've never seen an extX fs so badly damaged, and the fact that this happens during migration just amped this thought up. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 3:11 PM, combuster wrote: Nah, I've explicitly allowed hosted-engine vm to be able to access the NAS device as the NFS

Re: [ovirt-users] Recommended setup for a FC based storage domain

2014-06-10 Thread combuster
/etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf and /etc/vdsm/logger.conf , but unfortunately maybe I've jumped to conclusions, last weekend, that very same thin provisioned vm was running a simple export for 3hrs before I've killed the process. But I wondered: 1. The process that runs behind the export is qemu-i

Re: [ovirt-users] HP ILO2 , fence not working, with SSH port specified, a Bug?

2014-06-29 Thread combuster
Well if it's a bug then it would be resolved by now :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026662 Had the same doubts as you did. I really don't know why it wouldn't connect to iLO if the default port is specified, but I'm glad that you found a workaround. Ivan On 06/30/2014 08:36

Re: [ovirt-users] power management on ovirt3.6.1

2016-01-18 Thread combuster
Hi, you need at least two servers in the cluster for pm test to succeed. If you do, make sure that IP address of the iLO is pingable from all hosts in the cluster. oVirt engine log would also help in troubleshooting the issue. On 01/18/2016 02:10 PM, alireza sadeh seighalan wrote: hi every

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage network clarification

2016-01-18 Thread combuster
Hi Fil, this worked for me a couple of months back: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-November/036235.html I'll try to set this up again, and see if there are any issues. Which oVirt release are you running ? Ivan On 01/18/2016 02:56 PM, Fil Di Noto wrote: I'm having trouble sett

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage network clarification

2016-01-18 Thread combuster
39 AM, combuster wrote: Hi Fil, this worked for me a couple of months back: http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-November/036235.html I'll try to set this up again, and see if there are any issues. Which oVirt release are you running ? Ivan On 01/18/2016 02:56 PM, Fil Di Noto w

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage network clarification

2016-01-19 Thread combuster
rce False) bf482d82-d8f9-442d-ba93-da5ec225c8c3::DEBUG::2016-01-19 18:03:20,798::task::993::Storage.TaskManager.Task::(_decref) Task=`bf482d82-d8f9-442d-ba93-da5ec225c8c3`::ref 1 aborting True bf482d82-d8f9-442d-ba93-da5ec225c8c3::DEBUG::2016-01-19 18:03:20,799::task::919::Storage.TaskManager.Task::

Re: [ovirt-users] Storage network clarification

2016-01-19 Thread combuster
Increasing network ping timeout and lowering the number of io threads helped. Disk image gets created, but during that time nodes are pretty much unresponsive. I should've expected that on my setup... In any case, I hope this helps... Ivan On 01/19/2016 06:43 PM, combuster wrote: OK, se

Re: [ovirt-users] Promiscuous Mode

2016-03-05 Thread combuster
Hi Clint, you might want to check the macspoof hook features here: https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/tree/master/vdsm_hooks/macspoof This should override arp/spoofing filtering, that might be the cause of your issues with OpenVPN setup (first guess). On 03/05/2016 07:30 PM, Clint Boggio wrote: I

Re: [ovirt-users] Promiscuous Mode

2016-03-05 Thread combuster
there anything required to be installed on the hypervisor hosts themselves? Thanks, Chris On Mar 5, 2016 1:47 PM, "combuster" <mailto:combus...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Clint, you might want to check the macspoof hook features here: https://github.com/oVirt/vdsm/tree/m

Re: [ovirt-users] Promiscuous Mode

2016-03-05 Thread combuster
Ignore the link (minor accident while pasting). Yum will download the appropriate one from the repos. On 03/05/2016 08:09 PM, combuster wrote: Just the hook rpm (vdsm-hook-macspoof <http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7Server/noarch/vdsm-hook-macspoof-4.16.10-0.el7.noarch.

Re: [ovirt-users] Promiscuous Mode

2016-03-05 Thread combuster
rd and set the value "true" for it. If you want to remove filtering for a single interface, then replace steps 2 and 3 as outlined in the README. Kind regards, Ivan On 03/05/2016 08:21 PM, cl...@theboggios.com wrote: On 2016-03-05 13:13, combuster wrote: Ignore the link (minor ac

Re: [ovirt-users] Promiscuous Mode

2016-03-05 Thread combuster
It's great to know that it's working. Best of luck Clint. On 03/05/2016 09:09 PM, cl...@theboggios.com wrote: On 2016-03-05 13:34, combuster wrote: Correct procedure would be: 1. On each of your ovirt nodes run: yum install vdsm-hook-macspoof 2. On the engine run: sudo engine

Re: [ovirt-users] Promiscuous Mode

2016-03-05 Thread combuster
that scenario? On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:32 PM, combuster wrote: It's great to know that it's working. Best of luck Clint. On 03/05/2016 09:09 PM, cl...@theboggios.com wrote: On 2016-03-05 13:34, combuster wrote: Correct procedure would be: 1. On each of your ovirt nodes run: y