Re: Does broker federation work with azure service bus?

2014-03-04 Thread smartdog
Thanks for the reply. Would you please elaborate more as both support amqp 1.0? -- View this message in context: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Does-broker-federation-work-with-azure-service-bus-tp7605140p7605145.html Sent from the Apache Qpid users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -

Re: Does broker federation work with azure service bus?

2014-03-04 Thread Steve Huston
It won't work. -Steve > On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:18 PM, "smartdog" wrote: > > We need post some messages to Azure Service Bus and figure it would be nice > (in case Azure service bus is down) to post messages to the local qpid > broker first and then let the broker propagate messages to Azure. >

Does broker federation work with azure service bus?

2014-03-04 Thread smartdog
We need post some messages to Azure Service Bus and figure it would be nice (in case Azure service bus is down) to post messages to the local qpid broker first and then let the broker propagate messages to Azure. I tried with qpid-route -d queue add azureuser/passw...@namespace.servicebus.windo

Re: QPID C++ broker monitoring and management

2014-03-04 Thread Robbie Gemmell
It would need to be done ad-hoc at present, the steps we use to generate and deploy the maven artifacts using the Ant build for the components in the main Java tree wont really work with the QMF bits because of the differing layout and build they use. This is something we will need to look at even

Re: QPID C++ broker monitoring and management

2014-03-04 Thread Jakub Scholz
It would be also nice to have the Java QMF library uploaded to Maven repositories similarly to the Java client. But I`m not sure how complicated that would be. Thanks & Regards Jakub On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 03/04/2014 06:19 PM, Fraser Adams wrote: > >> I had *as

Re: QPID C++ broker monitoring and management

2014-03-04 Thread Gordon Sim
On 03/04/2014 06:19 PM, Fraser Adams wrote: I had *assumed* that because it was was on trunk it would be on a release - so I'm a bit confused if I'm honest. I've just checked and the first branch it's officially in is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.24/ Sorry, my mistake. As

Re: QPID C++ broker monitoring and management

2014-03-04 Thread Robbie Gemmell
It is included in the full source release, http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/qpid/0.26/qpid-0.26.tar.gz , it just hasn't got its own separate archive. Robbie On 4 March 2014 18:19, Fraser Adams wrote: > I had *assumed* that because it was was on trunk it would be on a release > - so I'm a bi

Re: QPID C++ broker monitoring and management

2014-03-04 Thread Fraser Adams
I had *assumed* that because it was was on trunk it would be on a release - so I'm a bit confused if I'm honest. I've just checked and the first branch it's officially in is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/branches/0.24/ Which is what I'd expect, not really sure what the score is with r

Re: AMQP 1.0 <-> 0-10 reply-to conversion

2014-03-04 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote: > On 4 March 2014 14:11, Gordon Sim wrote: > > > On 03/04/2014 12:38 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: > >> > >> On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote: > >>> > >>> The naive approach fo

Re: AMQP 1.0 <-> 0-10 reply-to conversion

2014-03-04 Thread Rob Godfrey
On 4 March 2014 14:11, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 03/04/2014 12:38 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: >> >> On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote: >>> >>> The naive approach for a 1.0 address "foo" is (I guess) to look up on the broker

Re: AMQP 1.0 <-> 0-10 reply-to conversion

2014-03-04 Thread Gordon Sim
On 03/04/2014 12:38 PM, Rafael Schloming wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote: The naive approach for a 1.0 address "foo" is (I guess) to look up on the broker side to see if the given there is an exchange named "foo" (in which ca

Re: AMQP 1.0 <-> 0-10 reply-to conversion

2014-03-04 Thread Rafael Schloming
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: > On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote: > >> The naive approach for a 1.0 address "foo" is (I guess) to look up on the >> broker side to see if the given there is an exchange named "foo" (in which >> case translate to 0-10 {exchange="foo", ro

Re: AMQP 1.0 <-> 0-10 reply-to conversion

2014-03-04 Thread Gordon Sim
On 03/04/2014 11:00 AM, Rob Godfrey wrote: The naive approach for a 1.0 address "foo" is (I guess) to look up on the broker side to see if the given there is an exchange named "foo" (in which case translate to 0-10 {exchange="foo", routing-key=""}) or a queue named "foo" (in which case translate

Re: QPID C++ broker monitoring and management

2014-03-04 Thread Gordon Sim
On 03/04/2014 08:48 AM, Jan Bares wrote: Is there any GUI based (web based) QPID management tool? Yes, Fraser Adams built a web based console for QMF. We don't seem to offer it in the releases yet (something we can fix soon perhaps, Justin, Fraser?), but you can get it from trunk (or any of t

AMQP 1.0 <-> 0-10 reply-to conversion

2014-03-04 Thread Rob Godfrey
I'm currently trying to tidy up some of the message conversion code inside the Java Broker, and wondering what the correct approach is with reply-to. In 1.0 the reply-to address is a simple string (which may have some structure when the OASIS Addressing spec is finalised, but until now can really

QPID C++ broker monitoring and management

2014-03-04 Thread Jan Bares
Hi, Which tools do you use for monitoring? I would like to use something like Zabbix (www.zabbix.com) for QPID monitoring, should I use the command line tool like qpid-stat to gather statistics or is there better option? And what do you monitor? This pops out of my mind (besides log): * lingeri