RE: Qpid C++ Broker 0.34 failing unit tests on Windows with Visual Studio 2013 Win64

2016-04-04 Thread Adel Boutros
Thank you Steve! Can you please point me out to the code which parses the log? I would like to locally add an ignore on the SSL error to make sure I have no other failures. Regarding the setup of the certificate, are there more specific information on what the certificate should contain, etc? Reg

Unroutable messages in Java Qpid Broker 6.0.0

2016-04-04 Thread Adel Boutros
Hello, In the documentation of Qpid Java Broker 6.0.0, it is mentioned here that unroutable messages will be discarded eventually. I have a test where a queue is bound to a topic and a message is sent which doesn't match the binding filter on purpose. Instead of the message being just discarded,

RE: Qpid C++ Broker 0.34 failing unit tests on Windows with Visual Studio 2013 Win64

2016-04-04 Thread Steve Huston
The test is failing because the test script looks through the log for errors and flags the SSL error. It isn't perfect and should be worked on, but at this point in time you can safely ignore that particular error. -Steve > -Original Message- > From: Adel Boutros [mailto:adelbout...@liv

RE: Qpid C++ Broker 0.34 failing unit tests on Windows with Visual Studio 2013 Win64

2016-04-04 Thread Adel Boutros
Hello Steve, This is the full output given. If what you are saying is correct, then I don't understand why the test is failing. Do you think there is an easy way to find out? Do you need some extra information? Regards,Adel > From: shus...@riverace.com > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: RE:

Question: Temporary queues: set up and when do they go away?

2016-04-04 Thread Flores, Paul A.
As subject states. Unclear how use so of the Address options as they are described. How do I set up a temporary queue that goes away when the receiver is closed? I am using the following in my code to set up a response queue. What has me asking this question is that using qpid-cofig I c

RE: Qpid C++ Broker 0.34 failing unit tests on Windows with Visual Studio 2013 Win64

2016-04-04 Thread Steve Huston
Hi Adel, Those messages are expected unless you set up a certificate, and do not indicate a failure of the actual test. -Steve > -Original Message- > From: Adel Boutros [mailto:adelbout...@live.com] > Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 2:15 PM > To: users@qpid.apache.org > Subject: RE: Qpid C

RE: Help!: Generation of a unique queue name... weird results..OR

2016-04-04 Thread Flores, Paul A.
Thanks Robbie. Helped to clarify what is going on! Which spurs question about temporary queues and when queues are deleted. That will be another question for the discussion board! From: Robbie Gemmell [robbie.gemm...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 04, 2

[RESULT] [VOTE] merge the proton mailing list into the users/dev lists

2016-04-04 Thread Robbie Gemmell
There were 13 binding +1 votes received and another 2 from users, with no other votes received. The vote has passed. I'll chat with infra in the days ahead about how things proceed. Robbie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubsc

Re: Help!: Generation of a unique queue name... weird results..OR

2016-04-04 Thread Robbie Gemmell
The general process is typically to establish somewhere for responses to go and start listening for them, send messages requiring response, process responses as they arrive. Not unlike a traditional message in an envelope. You can of course play with that order if for example you were using either

RE: Help!: Generation of a unique queue name... weird results..OR

2016-04-04 Thread Flores, Paul A.
Gordon, So am I right in understanding that after I generate a "reply to" address I should create a receiver so as to instantiate that queue before I send the message populated with the "reply to" address? So the order in which a "reply to" address is utilized 'matters'? A unique "reply to' qu

accept() method in Proton/Python BlockingConnection

2016-04-04 Thread Jakub Scholz
Hi, I was playing with the Python binding for Proton - in particular with the BlockingConnection. I noticed following behavior with the BlockingReceiver: - When I use the receiver to receive several messages without settling them and call accept afterwards, it accepts only one message. My origina

Re: [c++] Multi-threaded proton and C++11

2016-04-04 Thread Mark Banner
I completely agree Alan. We have recently been doing something very similar internally in C++03 and the C++11 primitives are sourly missed. We have managed to not use std::function by having a certain number of hardcoded events which can be sent to a connection engine and using custom promises/futu