Wonderful - that worked great, Ted - thanks!!!
> -Original Message-
> From: Ted Ross [mailto:tr...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 11:31 AM
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Routing messages between two brokers
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> Setting up the addresses as waypoints
This is the first official release of the test tool qpid-interop-test.
I have provided a release candidate at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/interop-test/0.1.0-rc4/
Instructions for building and installation are in QUICKSTART.md.
Please test and vote.
Thanks,
Kim van der Riet
-
Hi Steve,
Setting up the addresses as waypoints configures the router to properly
route producers _to_ the broker and consumers _from_ the broker. Your case
is a little different. Try this alternative configuration:
autoLink {
addr: to.myapp
connection: appbroker
dir: in
phase:
rgodfrey wrote
> On 27 October 2017 at 10:43, Vavricka <
> vavricka.tomas@
> > wrote:
>
> In the period 28.10.2017 10:00 - 30.10.2017 10:00; both certificates are
> valid... the broker can't really know which is "preferred" by the client,
> I
> would think that we should always go with the one w
On 27 October 2017 at 10:43, Vavricka wrote:
> I can imagine these situations where it can be helpful.
>
> 1.
>
> * There is active/passive cluster (provides a fully redundant instance of
> each node, which is only brought online when its associated primary node
> fails) environment where Java br
I can imagine these situations where it can be helpful.
1.
* There is active/passive cluster (provides a fully redundant instance of
each node, which is only brought online when its associated primary node
fails) environment where Java broker is running on node1
* Shared drive is used for keysto