jdow wrote:
> I believe you could "blacklist_from". That would train SpamAssassin's
> Bayes filter -
Or not. Both USER_IN_BLACKLIST and USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO have tflags set
to userconf noautolearn (in current 3.2.5 rules), which means that
SpamAssassin will ignore their scores when deciding whethe
> -Original Message-
> From: Jo Rhett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 12:28 PM
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: re2c/sa-compile failures with SOUGHT ruleset?
>
> Ever since I've updated to the SOUGHT ruleset I get fairly consistent
> sa-compile failures. I lo
Ever since I've updated to the SOUGHT ruleset I get fairly consistent
sa-compile failures. I looked through the archives, but found only a
note to update to the latest re2c, which I have done with no real
change.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ re2c --version
re2c 0.13.5
About once a week the compi
Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
> I run an Ubuntu machine with qmail, qmail-scanner and SpamAssassin.
> Yes, I know this isn't the qmail or qmail-scanner list, but I
> genuinely think this is an SA issue. Well, a user issue with SA,
> really.
>
> Normally, the system runs great, rejecting heaps o
I run an Ubuntu machine with qmail, qmail-scanner and SpamAssassin. Yes, I
know this
isn't the qmail or qmail-scanner list, but I genuinely think this is an SA
issue. Well, a
user issue with SA, really.
Normally, the system runs great, rejecting heaps of spam. But after a reboot
(our power
