On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 17:01:21 +0100
> On 11.11.20 15:41, RW wrote:
> >Note that without a DKIM pass, SPF is easily spoofed in TxRep.
>
> is it? how does that work then?
It's implicit in the next bit.
> >DKIM reputations are identified by a combination of header from
> >address and signing doma
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2020-11-11 17:01:
Martin Gregorie skrev den 2020-11-11 11:02:
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 09:52 +0100, Tobi wrote:
On 11.11.20 15:41, RW wrote:
Note that without a DKIM pass, SPF is easily spoofed in TxRep.
is it? how does that work then?
On 11.11.20 17:20, Ben
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2020-11-11 17:01:
Martin Gregorie skrev den 2020-11-11 11:02:
> On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 09:52 +0100, Tobi wrote:
On 11.11.20 15:41, RW wrote:
Note that without a DKIM pass, SPF is easily spoofed in TxRep.
is it? how does that work then?
signedby tracking in
Martin Gregorie skrev den 2020-11-11 11:02:
> On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 09:52 +0100, Tobi wrote:
> I suppose some may find it useful to datestamp entries with the last
> time mail was sent to them and remove any addresses that haven't
> been sent mail for 'x' days/weeks/months/years but I've never
>
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 11:14:05 +0100
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Martin Gregorie skrev den 2020-11-11 11:02:
> > On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 09:52 +0100, Tobi wrote:
>
> > I suppose some may find it useful to datestamp entries with the last
> > time mail was sent to them and remove any addresses that haven
Martin Gregorie skrev den 2020-11-11 11:02:
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 09:52 +0100, Tobi wrote:
I suppose some may find it useful to datestamp entries with the last
time mail was sent to them and remove any addresses that haven't been
sent mail for 'x' days/weeks/months/years but I've never needed
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 09:52 +0100, Tobi wrote:
> > If I only had a ready-made list of those important domains.
>
> If you filter for customer domains then maybe (depending the customer
> domain) adding the customer domain to spf checks is worth a look too.
>
That's easy: keep a database of addres
> If I only had a ready-made list of those important domains.
If you filter for customer domains then maybe (depending the customer
domain) adding the customer domain to spf checks is worth a look too.
On 11/11/20 6:29 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> John Hardin wrote:
>>
>>> Moreover, after reading