Title: ignore me - testing my spf record
testing
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:02 PM
> To: Steven Stern; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Testing SPF
>
>
> At 04:59 PM 10/18/2004, Steven Stern wrote:
> >I've set up the SPF TXT record for my domain, al
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 11:49 AM
> To: 'Mathieu Nantel'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [OFFTOPIC] Opinions on DSPAM
>
>
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Mathieu Nantel [mailto:[EMAI
> -Original Message-
> From: ip.guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 5:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: spamassassin and user whitelist/blacklist prefs
>
>
> ip.guy wrote:
>
> > hi
> >
> > my qmail server only acts as the
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 5:14 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RBL Misfires?
>
>
> It would be useful if you could forward the messages that falsely
> trigger on RBLs, along with name resoluti
yup. ;)
wonder if anybody's filed a bug about that - maybe standard html tags should be
ignored in the uppercase tests.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 1:44 PM
To: Nate Schindler
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 1:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: JS and EXE test isn't working?
>
> Where is the JS/EXE test?
The MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE test was removed in 3.0, it seems. I guess they want
to
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:57 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RBL Misfires?
> Most likely scenario:
>
> 1. Someone erroneously reports the domain name to SURBL.
> 2. You receive and scan the messa
Title: RBL Misfires?
Once in a while, I notice a hit for an RBL-related test that seems a little off. When I check for the existance of a record in the list, I can't find one. Below is a match SA 3 found in an e-mail from one of our dealers. I thought it was curious that they were listed,
It works with one slight problem fixed in CVS already.
If set, the reject threshold (-r ) in 0.2.0 looks for "hits" instead of
"score".
If you set to -1 (reject anything tagged as spam), 0.2.0 works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Randall Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, Oc
?
Nate Schindler wrote:
> Just a curiosity question for now - is auto-expiring the AWL a planned
> feature?
> My auto-whitelist is about 3x the size of bayes_toks. I imagine it'll
> become problematic eventually, since it's only growing.
>
> ...or is there already so
Title: AWL auto_expire?
Just a curiosity question for now - is auto-expiring the AWL a planned feature?
My auto-whitelist is about 3x the size of bayes_toks. I imagine it'll become problematic eventually, since it's only growing.
...or is there already some way to expire old entries from t
a --sync operation is performed when you sa-learn things. This commits the
journal to the database, and removes the file.
it's recreated, written to, committed, and removed automatically when needed.
sa-learn just forces this to happen whenever it's run.
it's by design.
-Original Message-
they mean microsoft equipment... :)
-Original Message-
From: Andy Jezierski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 3:13 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [OT] Uptime was [scan times up!]
Ken Goods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/05/2004 04:50:30 PM:
>
You can either set up an SQL database for user_prefs to hold both global and
user-specific entries - that's how I'm doing it, or according to Theo:
"a quick workaround for this problem, btw, is running spamd with
"--max-conn-per-child=1". it essentially reverts spamd to the 2.x way, and each
chi
put an @GLOBAL whitelist_from record in the SQL database, and it hits
consistently.
Is this by design? I don't remember seeing anything in the docs about this
change.
Thanks,
Nate
-Original Message-
From: Nate Schindler
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 12:55 PM
To: 'users@spamassassi
I have a similar problem with whitelist_from entries in local.cf. --lint shows
no issues.
What's happening with me is that whitelist_from works for the first few hits,
then it stops working entirely.
the line in local.cf says "whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Running spamd in debug mode, I cau
> Perhaps you might consider a disposable-email-address
> factory. Generate a disposable email address that forwards
> to your real email address. Then sign the disposable email
> address up for the list.
>
> If you start getting spam at that email address, discontinue
> the email address.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kris Deugau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:24 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: spoofed Received header
>
> Er, I think you're getting your terminology mixed up. Those
> are usually
> considered to be the
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Yardley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 12:58 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: spoofed Received header
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 12:50:04PM -0700, Nate Schindler wrote:
>
I actually block all incoming mail that claims to be from my domain. The only
problem is that I don't get copies of messages that I send to some lists, such
as this one.
But... as far as I'm concerned, if a mail server isn't listed as an MX for
, it should use in the mail from or envelope
fro
Title: How did this not get tagged??
BAYES_40=-1.096
HTML_90_100=0.022
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02=0.018
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001
MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.177
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.216
RCVD_IN_SBL=0.107
URIBL_SBL=0.996
URIBL_WS_SURBL
=1.462
OPTO_HEADER=?
SARE_MSGID_EMPTY=?
not finding two of these tests on
Title: whitelist_from broken?
whitelist_from in v3 seems inconsistant. after a service restart, it fires correctly about 5 times. after that, it stops working entirely.
anybody else having this issue?
Thanks,
Nate
Title: Auto learn as Ham when ALL_TRUSTED?
Looks like others are posting this question as well, but I couldn't see it in the archives...
I recently upgraded to v3. Everything looks great so far, except one change that I can't seem to figure out.
We have an internal Exchange server, and S
24 matches
Mail list logo
