Re: Simple question TRUE or FALSE (More data to answer this question)

2005-05-19 Thread Raquel Rice
On Thu, 19 May 2005 16:33:36 -0500 "Jon Dossey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Menno van Bennekom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: David Velásquez Restrepo > > Subject: Re: Simple question TRUE or FALSE (More data to answer > > this question) > > > > > Q) With spamassassin (and all the abo

Re: Win32, Autodeleting messages with high scores?

2005-01-07 Thread Raquel Rice
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:48:33 -0800 Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:23:50 -0800 > "Jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyone have any examples of how to read the "X-Spam-Level: > > &

Re: Win32, Autodeleting messages with high scores?

2005-01-07 Thread Raquel Rice
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:23:50 -0800 "Jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone have any examples of how to read the "X-Spam-Level: > " and delete messages if the score is over 15? > > Thank you > It depends a great deal on what software you're using. I use sendmail and proc

Re: Recent Debian Package

2004-12-14 Thread Raquel Rice
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:02:42 +0100 "Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for a recent package of Spamassassin for Debian STABLE > (Woody) please. Either 2.64 or 3.x ? > > The apt-get.org has no one. > > Where could I find ? > > [This is a crosspos

Re: RulesDuJour web site?

2004-12-03 Thread Raquel Rice
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 10:15:20 +0100 "C-Store Christoph Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > can anyone tell a me what this can be used for ? I have SA 3.01 > set up and running fine now - what does this script acutally > update ? > > Thanks, > > Chris In conjuction with my_rules_du_jou

Re: bofra

2004-11-12 Thread Raquel Rice
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 14:32:29 -0800 "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Dennis Davis wrote: > > > > | Sophos appear to have just issued an IDE file for this: > > | > > | http://www.sophos.co

Re: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

2004-11-03 Thread Raquel Rice
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:58:10 -0500 Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > As much as I hate Outlook, I have to support it.. ugh.. > > Is there anyway to get the full source and message, from outlook > without having to view source, then view headers? I want the full > untainted source as I can g

Re: Sorry Florida.

2004-09-30 Thread Raquel Rice
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:10:07 -0400 AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've noticed about at 10% decrease in spam since Florida started > having all those problems with tropical weather. > > Anyone else notice this? > > I'm not trying to bash Florida, just something I noticed in the > logs.

Re: timeout www.spamassasin.org ?

2004-09-23 Thread Raquel Rice
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:40:16 -0400 Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the > spamassassin.apache.org site as well. > > Anyone else? > > Chris Santerre Maybe it's *you* having a problem? -- Raquel ===

Re: SlashDotting spammers

2004-09-23 Thread Raquel Rice
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:21:24 -0400 Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700 > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Kenneth Porter wrote: > >>

Re: SlashDotting spammers

2004-09-23 Thread Raquel Rice
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kenneth Porter wrote: > > Every time I see a spam story on SlashDot I think how the > > SlashDot effect could be used for good by getting everyone to > > visit the spammer's site and take it to its knees, while driving > > up the spam

Re: SA 3.0 and Bigevil

2004-09-22 Thread Raquel Rice
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:40:47 -0400 Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just updated Bigevil, which now is 1.25 megs in size. It will > consume the souls of your server, your family, and that cute > girl/guy at your local coffee shop! > > With the release of SA 3.0, for the love of all t

Re: [OT] FUN: Something to send your family members!

2004-09-15 Thread Raquel Rice
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:00:01 -0400 Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2004, at 12:14 PM, Chris Santerre wrote: > > > So for anyone who knows what I'm talking about on this page, > > feel free to > > spam it to all your friends and family! ;) > > > > On my desk at gradual scho

Re: Subject line

2004-09-14 Thread Raquel Rice
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:15:21 -0400 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can choose to implement it in > procmail locally, it's quite easy. > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/40735/match=subject+prefix+new+list > > The fundamental points against implementi

Re: Just how many addresses are there for this list?

2004-09-14 Thread Raquel Rice
On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:08:26 -0500 Tom Meunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Don't use the To: address field, use the List-Id if your MUA can > > do it: > > > > List-Id: "SpamAssassin Users" > > users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Oh, pooh. > > Timely (or perhaps prescient?) qu

Re: Cannot write to journal and others

2004-09-07 Thread Raquel Rice
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:38:20 -0500 "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Check the permissions on the directory /var/.spamassassin I > > believe it should be readable/writeable by all mail processes > > ... by all > > It used to be 0666 - I changed it to 0777 with no effect. Looking > at

Re: Cannot write to journal and others

2004-09-07 Thread Raquel Rice
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 13:41:15 -0500 "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sep 5 13:23:56 Luke spamd[29971]: cannot write to > /var/.spamassassin/bayes_journal, Bayes db update ignored Check the permissions on the directory /var/.spamassassin I believe it should be readable/writeable by all