>Changed and Amavis has been restarted. I’ll check the headers on the next
>piece of spam to come through. Thanks
I’m still trying to figure out how illegitimate stuff like this is getting
through. It’s obviously a virus (which was caught) but then why did the email
get through? I see the flag
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Greg Ledford wrote:
What exactly are SA headers supposed to look like?
On 19.08.14 13:05, John Hardin wrote:
SA headers look like this:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.138 tagged_above=-100 required=5
tests=[MISSING_MID=0.14, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.0
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Greg Ledford wrote:
What exactly are SA headers supposed to look like?
SA headers look like this:
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.138
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.138 tagged_above=-100 required=5
tests=[MISSING_MID=0.14, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, S
What exactly are SA headers supposed to look like? I’m still getting quite a
bit of spam coming through. It’s blocking quite a bit but I’m not so sure SA is
even doing its job. Is there maybe a way to just block everything from anything
.us? Stuff like this is being missed (what’s really amusin
>Use sa_tag_level_deflt = -100;
>All your emails will have the SpamAssassin headers.
Changed and Amavis has been restarted. I’ll check the headers on the next piece
of spam to come through. Thanks for the great help!
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Greg Ledford
wrote:
>>Take a look at the "sa_tag_level_deflt" in your amavisd configuration
> file.
>
> $sa_tag_level_deflt = 5.5;
>
> $sa_tag2_level_deflt= 6.0;
>
> $sa_spam_subject_tag= '***POSSIBLE SPAM***';
>
> $sa_kill_level_deflt= 7.0;
>
>Take a look at the "sa_tag_level_deflt" in your amavisd configuration file.
$sa_tag_level_deflt = 5.5;
$sa_tag2_level_deflt= 6.0;
$sa_spam_subject_tag= '***POSSIBLE SPAM***';
$sa_kill_level_deflt= 7.0;
I did. I bumped the levels a bit because they were catching some legitimate
e
