Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

I repeat myself ;-) > It seems you are not using *any* custom rules. You may want to check out > RDJ and SARE. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

From: "Thomas Booms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Here's the content of my local.cf: > > rewrite_subject 1 > report_safe 2 > trusted_networks > user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:: > user_scores_sql_username > user_scores_sql_password > user_scores_sql_custom_query SELECT preference, va

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

jdow schrieb: From: "Thomas Booms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Loren Wilton schrieb: Well, header I have on detected spams like these (possibly I need to reconfigure something) to get the above lists: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=1.5 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 autolearn=

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

jdow schrieb: From: "Thomas Booms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Loren Wilton schrieb: Well, header I have on detected spams like these (possibly I need to reconfigure something) to get the above lists: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=1.5 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 autolearn

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

From: "Thomas Booms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Loren Wilton schrieb: > > >>Well, header I have on detected spams like these (possibly I need to > >>reconfigure something) to get the above lists: > >> > >>X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=1.5 tests=BAYES_00, > >>DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 autolearn=ham

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

From: "Thomas Booms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Loren Wilton schrieb: > > >>Well, header I have on detected spams like these (possibly I need to > >>reconfigure something) to get the above lists: > >> > >>X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=1.5 tests=BAYES_00, > >>DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 autolearn=ham

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

Kai Schaetzl schrieb: It seems you are not using *any* custom rules. You may want to check out RDJ and SARE. Kai I've found in my debugging infos the part, where Razor wasnt be able to read its config file. This part i've corrected with positive debugging infos. Hope it's working now. If

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

It seems you are not using *any* custom rules. You may want to check out RDJ and SARE. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

Loren Wilton schrieb: Well, header I have on detected spams like these (possibly I need to reconfigure something) to get the above lists: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=1.5 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 This says that the message is NOT spam. B

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

Loren Wilton schrieb: Well, header I have on detected spams like these (possibly I need to reconfigure something) to get the above lists: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=1.5 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 This says that the message is NOT spam. B

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

> Well, header I have on detected spams like these (possibly I need to > reconfigure something) to get the above lists: > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=1.5 tests=BAYES_00, > DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 autolearn=ham version=3.0.4 This says that the message is NOT spam. Bayes in particular is

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

From: "Thomas Booms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I have changed the set the REPORT_SAFE to 2 now and get the headers. > What you see it are network tests running or not? > > > > >From - Sat Jul 9 12:58:05 2005 > X-UIDL: 1120906515.M816654P13835051595651361458.host1 > X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 > X-Moz

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

Loren Wilton schrieb: How can I see in mail header about if network tests run? You would see tests like SURBL and other net tests hitting. For instance: 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

Loren Wilton schrieb: How can I see in mail header about if network tests run? You would see tests like SURBL and other net tests hitting. For instance: 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

> How can I see in mail header about if network tests run? You would see tests like SURBL and other net tests hitting. For instance: 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 3.1 RCVD_IN

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

You need URIBL lookups. See www.surbl.org and www.uribl.com for information. I've installed that stuff several times because of some problems I got in the beginning. On the last install it seems something went wrong and no Net::DNS was installed. So I've made it a few days again. Do you h

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

Andy Jezierski wrote: Chris Thielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/07/2005 01:15:24 AM: > Hi Thomas, > > Your email scored nearly 25 on my system. Chickenpox contributed 4.2, > uribls contributed tons. > > HTH :) > As has been pointed out, make sure your network tests are turned on. I a

Re: How can I correctly detect these spams?

Chris Thielen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/07/2005 01:15:24 AM: > Hi Thomas, > > Your email scored nearly 25 on my system.  Chickenpox contributed 4.2, > uribls contributed tons. > > HTH :) > As has been pointed out, make sure your network tests are turned on. I am surprised that I only

Re: (14.6) How can I correctly detect these spams?

Hi Thomas, Your email scored nearly 25 on my system. Chickenpox contributed 4.2, uribls contributed tons. HTH :) Thomas Booms wrote: Spam detection software, running on the system "ns1.sandgnat.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attac

RE: How can I correctly detect these spams?

> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Booms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 2:59 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: How can I correctly detect these spams? > > Hi all, > > I have set all BAYES tests to default values a

How can I correctly detect these spams?

Hi all, I have set all BAYES tests to default values and put in the $GLOBAL all SORBS test in my users database. But since the last hours I got these following listed spams through without tagging as spam: From - Wed Jul 6 23:41:18 2005 X-UIDL: 1120671712.M917383P13835051595651377415.hos