Hi!
pyzor -d ping
Mine says this, but I applied the 3 in 1 patch that I learned about in this
thread:
sending: 'User: anonymous\nTime: 1134325707\nSig:
177d0df77c0b91197da93b41c85c4f5f3d9b823b\n\nOp: ping\nThread: 31207\nPV:
2.0\n\n'
received: 'Thread: 31207\nCode: 200\nDiag: OK\nPV: 2.0\n
On 12/11/2005 07:27 pm, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> SickBoy wrote:
> > Pollywog wrote:
> >> I checked another machine that has not been patched and is also running
> >> the same software versions and there were no errors there, which
> >> surprised me, since I had not applied the patch there.
>
> T
SickBoy wrote:
Pollywog wrote:
I checked another machine that has not been patched and is also running the
same software versions and there were no errors there, which surprised me,
since I had not applied the patch there.
The 'patched errors' only happen in a select few messages. So it's
Pyzor is back up from this end:
$ pyzor ping
66.250.40.33:24441 (200, 'OK')
Ed
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Randomly generated quote:
"Let no one come to you without leaving better and happier."
- Mother Teresa
Heute (am 11.12.2005) schrieb Pollywog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]),
> I checked another machine that has not been patched and is also running the
> same software versions and there were no errors there, which surprised me,
> since I had not applied the patch there.
I`ve patched nothing. And I have no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pollywog wrote:
>
> I checked another machine that has not been patched and is also running the
> same software versions and there were no errors there, which surprised me,
> since I had not applied the patch there.
>
>
> 8)
>
As far as I'm con
On 12/11/2005 06:46 pm, SickBoy wrote:
>
> In the time of our lil' conversation pyzor got back from dead and it's
> functioning properly now.
>
> The thing I ment was that the pyzor suddenly died few days ago, and
> finnaly got back this afternoon; applying a patch has nothing to do with
> the ser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pollywog wrote:
>
> Mine says this, but I applied the 3 in 1 patch that I learned about in this
> thread:
>
>
> sending: 'User: anonymous\nTime: 1134325707\nSig:
> 177d0df77c0b91197da93b41c85c4f5f3d9b823b\n\nOp: ping\nThread: 31207\nPV:
> 2.0\n\n
On 12/11/2005 11:13 am, SickBoy wrote:
> pyzor -d ping
Mine says this, but I applied the 3 in 1 patch that I learned about in this
thread:
sending: 'User: anonymous\nTime: 1134325707\nSig:
177d0df77c0b91197da93b41c85c4f5f3d9b823b\n\nOp: ping\nThread: 31207\nPV:
2.0\n\n'
received: 'Thread: 312
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Knuth wrote:
> Heute (am 11.12.2005) schrieb Chris,
>
>
>>This may be OT, but has anyone noticed that pyzor has been timeing out for
>>the past three days? If so, anyone have any idea as to why?
>
>
>
> no problems here
>
>
Hmm, are you SU
On 12/11/2005 03:35 am, Chris wrote:
> You can obtain a patch for that here that takes care of that problem:
>
> From http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4580
>
> To make it simple, I have combined those 3 patches into 1...
> http://www.engelken.net/download/pyzor.patch
>
> Just cd to
On Saturday 10 December 2005 9:20 pm, Pollywog wrote:
> On 12/11/2005 03:06 am, Chris wrote:
> > This may be OT, but has anyone noticed that pyzor has been timeing out
> > for the past three days? If so, anyone have any idea as to why?
>
> I have been seeing this in my logs:
>
> pyzor: check faile
Heute (am 11.12.2005) schrieb Chris,
> This may be OT, but has anyone noticed that pyzor has been timeing out for
> the past three days? If so, anyone have any idea as to why?
no problems here
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867 - VoIP: +49 (0) 322 212
On 12/11/2005 03:06 am, Chris wrote:
> This may be OT, but has anyone noticed that pyzor has been timeing out for
> the past three days? If so, anyone have any idea as to why?
I have been seeing this in my logs:
pyzor: check failed: internal error
I upgraded Spamassassin to version 3.1 about 3
This may be OT, but has anyone noticed that pyzor has been timeing out for
the past three days? If so, anyone have any idea as to why?
--
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
21:05:34 up 7 days, 4:07, 2 users, load average: 1.44, 1.44, 0.82
Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kern
15 matches
Mail list logo