From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so SA does not trap it, should i be looking at a procmail rule to dump the
emails.
Not a bad idea. If for some reason you really want to keep them around but
detect them, sare_specific or one of the similar files should catch these.
I forget what I d
> so SA does not trap it, should i be looking at a procmail rule to dump the
> emails.
Not a bad idea. If for some reason you really want to keep them around but
detect them, sare_specific or one of the similar files should catch these.
Loren
From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ok so its a virus on some else's PC but i see quite a few incoming
> in the last week. my AV dropped the attached zip.
>
> so SA does not trap it, should i be looking at a procmail rule to
> dump the emails.
SA does not intentionally try to cat
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 05:27:07PM -, Obantec Support wrote:
> ok so its a virus on some else's PC but i see quite a few incoming in the
> last week. my AV dropped the attached zip.
I call my anti-virus (ClamAV via clamassassin, BTW) from
/etc/procmailrc. If it says it's a virus, it goes stra
t;
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:20 PM
Subject: RE: seeing a few new spams with low SA scoring
> From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>[ Example Spam (trimmed to the basics) ]
> >
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > S
From: Obantec Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
[ Example Spam (trimmed to the basics) ]
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: You visit illegal websites
>
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> we have logged your IP-address on more than 30 illegal Websites.
>
> Important:
> Plea
Obantec Support wrote:
> SA3.0.0 lowest seen 1.5
>
(virus snipped)
That's not spam, it's a virus...
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
