Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems [solved]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben: Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there problems with mail header identification? Am I in the wrong list with

Re: Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there problems with mail header identification? Am I in the wrong list with this question? Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] for

Re: Re: Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben: Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there problems with mail header identification? Am I in the wrong list with this question? Mar 13 01:16:18 ns

Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am 16.03.2005 um 08:55 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben: Am 16.03.2005 um 00:31 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:27:28AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there problems with mail header

Re: Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

Are there problems with mail header identification? Am I in the wrong list with this question? Thanks Lars Dierich Mar 13 01:16:18 ns spamd[28893]: processing message [EMAIL PROTECTED] for web321p1:104. Mar 13 01:16:20 ns spamd[28893]: Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or

Re: Upgrade... + other (perl?) problems

I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.2 via CPAN with no problems. Yes, I read http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/UPGRADE und did change my local.cf. 1) Now Mail don't get tagged as spam == /va/log/mail Mar 14 12:34:33 ns spamd[27959]: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at