Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
06/08/2005 02:03:08 PM:
> According to the wiki, Backhair is unnecessary with SA 3.0.0 (and
presumably
> the newer versions as well).
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets
>
> Bowie
Ah, that's right. I couldn't remember why I
wasn't r
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I haven't seen weeds hit in some time. But I only look at low-scoring
> spam, and it may well be that some of the really high-scoring stuff had
> help from weeds.
>
> Tripwire and Chickenpox and Backhair are still quite helpful in my
> opinion, if
I haven't seen weeds hit in some time. But I only look at low-scoring spam,
and it may well be that some of the really high-scoring stuff had help from
weeds.
Tripwire and Chickenpox and Backhair are still quite helpful in my opinion,
if you are in an english speaking situation. Some of these ca
I'm getting ready to upgrade to a new
server and have been looking through the rules that I use. I know
that the chickenpox and weeds rules haven't been updated in a very long
time. But have they or a variation of them been incorporated into
the new SA releases or new SARE rules? Should I still