RE: Rules Q: chickenpox & weeds

2005-06-08 Thread Andy Jezierski
Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/08/2005 02:03:08 PM: > According to the wiki, Backhair is unnecessary with SA 3.0.0 (and presumably > the newer versions as well). > > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets > > Bowie Ah, that's right.  I couldn't remember why I wasn't r

RE: Rules Q: chickenpox & weeds

2005-06-08 Thread Bowie Bailey
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I haven't seen weeds hit in some time. But I only look at low-scoring > spam, and it may well be that some of the really high-scoring stuff had > help from weeds. > > Tripwire and Chickenpox and Backhair are still quite helpful in my > opinion, if

Re: Rules Q: chickenpox & weeds

2005-06-08 Thread Loren Wilton
I haven't seen weeds hit in some time. But I only look at low-scoring spam, and it may well be that some of the really high-scoring stuff had help from weeds. Tripwire and Chickenpox and Backhair are still quite helpful in my opinion, if you are in an english speaking situation. Some of these ca

Rules Q: chickenpox & weeds

2005-06-08 Thread Andy Jezierski
I'm getting ready to upgrade to a new server and have been looking through the rules that I use.  I know that the chickenpox and weeds rules haven't been updated in a very long time.  But have they or a variation of them been incorporated into the new SA releases or new SARE rules?  Should I still