Re: autolearn never learns ham

2005-01-28 Thread breena
Thank you Matt =). So most of the heuristics seem to be looking for SPAM. What are the ones that would push a mail towards being HAM (and that are not ignored by autolearn bayes)? So far I have found one: ALL_TRUSTED. Thanks! Breena On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:41:12 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote At

Re: autolearn never learns ham

2005-01-28 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:06 PM 1/28/2005, breena wrote: Thank you Matt =). So most of the heuristics seem to be looking for SPAM. What are the ones that would push a mail towards being HAM (and that are not ignored by autolearn bayes)? So far I have found one: ALL_TRUSTED. A few network tests also qualify:

Re: autolearn never learns ham

2005-01-26 Thread Matt Kettler
At 05:37 PM 1/25/2005, breena wrote: I have been checking my logs and it seems that even when an email comes in with a whitelisted address (making its score below the default threshold for autolearn ham), it is not learned as ham. According to the logs, nothing is ever autolearned as ham. Does