> From: Doc Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >
> > Does this fix the performance problems I was having, or does it just
> fix
> > the UTF errors showing in the logs with Perl < 5.8.8 ?
>
> You might try it and see if it helps with the performance. Since it
> do
e hit rates on those rules.
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "Bret Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:49 PM
Subject: RE: sa-compile and SARE
> Does this fix the performance problems I was having, or
does it just fix
> the UTF erro
> > Does this fix the performance problems I was having, or
> does it just fix
> > the UTF errors showing in the logs with Perl < 5.8.8 ?
>
> You might try it and see if it helps with the performance.
> Since it does
> fix the UTF-8 issue it won't be doing as much logging and
> grinding. let us kno
At 10:36 AM 5/22/2007, Loren Wilton wrote:
So, can we now remove the "use bytes;" line?
Should be able to. If this doesn't work we have some more files
that need to be updated, and would like to know what they might be.
Ok, done. I'll post any timeouts that happen.
Here's the short versio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
>
> Does this fix the performance problems I was having, or does it just fix
> the UTF errors showing in the logs with Perl < 5.8.8 ?
You might try it and see if it helps with the performance. Since it does
fix the UTF-8 iss
Does this fix the performance problems I was having, or does it just fix
the UTF errors showing in the logs with Perl < 5.8.8 ?
Just fixes the problems with the errors.
Loren
> -Original Message-
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 1:36 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: sa-compile and SARE
>
> > So, can we now remove the "use bytes;" line?
>
> Should be abl
So, can we now remove the "use bytes;" line?
Should be able to. If this doesn't work we have some more files that need
to be updated, and would like to know what they might be.
Loren
At 06:47 AM 5/21/2007, Doc Schneider wrote:
I just now committed fixed rule sets for SARE.
Please give it an hour or so to become available. And also let me know
if you're still seeing these issues.
Thanks!
Thank you!
So, can we now remove the "use bytes;" line?
--
Jerry Durand, Durand
Doc Schneider wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Scheidell wrote:
Please give it an hour or so to become available. And also
let me know if you're still seeing these issues.
Are they only available via channel? This brought old rule up:
http://www.rulesemp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> Please give it an hour or so to become available. And also
>> let me know if you're still seeing these issues.
>>
>
> Are they only available via channel? This brought old rule up:
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_s
>
> Please give it an hour or so to become available. And also
> let me know if you're still seeing these issues.
>
Are they only available via channel? This brought old rule up:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_stocks.cf
_
Randal, Phil wrote:
Doc Schneider wrote:
I just now committed fixed rule sets for SARE.
Please give it an hour or so to become available. And also let me know
if you're still seeing these issues.
Thanks!
Can you tell us which SARE rules were amended?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] channels]$ ls -l | gr
Doc Schneider wrote:
>
> I just now committed fixed rule sets for SARE.
>
> Please give it an hour or so to become available. And also let me know
> if you're still seeing these issues.
>
> Thanks!
Can you tell us which SARE rules were amended?
Just so we can do a sanity check.
Cheers,
Phil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
> On Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:44 AM Doc Schneider wrote:
>
>> No, the 70_sare_stocks.cf was re-scored and a couple rules were
>> removed from it and had nothing to do with the UTF-8 issue. I've just
>> about gotten the rul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> please excuse me if the archives already answer the question and I
>> overlooked it.
>>
>> I am going to upgrade to 3.2.0 this week but remember reading that
>> sa-compile will not
Koopmann, Jan-Peter wrote:
Hi,
please excuse me if the archives already answer the question and I
overlooked it.
I am going to upgrade to 3.2.0 this week but remember reading that
sa-compile will not work with SARE rules currently. If I understand it
correctly when using sa-compile it will
Hi,
please excuse me if the archives already answer the question and I overlooked
it.
I am going to upgrade to 3.2.0 this week but remember reading that sa-compile
will not work with SARE rules currently. If I understand it correctly when
using sa-compile it will be used for all rules so you
18 matches
Mail list logo
