Re: spam score question

2015-04-24 Thread Thom Miller
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 02:50:11 +0200 Mark Martinec wrote: > >> >> On April 22, 2015 8:44:59 PM EDT, Thom Miller > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:16:40 -0700 > >> >>> Michael Williamson wrote: > >> It appears to me that spamassassin can produce different spam > >> scores fo

Re: spam score question

2015-04-23 Thread Mark Martinec
>> On April 22, 2015 8:44:59 PM EDT, Thom Miller >> wrote: >>> On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:16:40 -0700 >>> Michael Williamson wrote: It appears to me that spamassassin can produce different spam scores for the same email. In particular, I have noticed that points are omitted for R

Re: spam score question

2015-04-23 Thread Thom Miller
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:17:12 -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > On 4/22/2015 11:19 PM, Thom Miller wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:23:22 -0400 > > "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > > > >> Are you starting spamd before your networking and local dns are > >> started? Regards, > >> KAM > > No. spamd is

Re: spam score question

2015-04-23 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 4/22/2015 11:19 PM, Thom Miller wrote: On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:23:22 -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: Are you starting spamd before your networking and local dns are started? Regards, KAM No. spamd is started after the network is up and running. According to https://spamassassin.apache.org/

Re: spam score question

2015-04-22 Thread Thom Miller
On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 21:23:22 -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote: > Are you starting spamd before your networking and local dns are > started? Regards, > KAM No. spamd is started after the network is up and running. According to https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.h

Re: spam score question

2015-04-22 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Are you starting spamd before your networking and local dns are started? Regards, KAM On April 22, 2015 8:44:59 PM EDT, Thom Miller wrote: >On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:16:40 -0700 >Michael Williamson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have another question. >> >> It appears to me that spamassassin can produc

Re: spam score question

2015-04-22 Thread Thom Miller
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:16:40 -0700 Michael Williamson wrote: > Hi, > > I have another question. > > It appears to me that spamassassin can produce different spam scores > for the same email. > In particular, I have noticed that points are omitted for > RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS (Spamhaus blacklist) somet

Re: spam score question

2015-04-18 Thread Michael Williamson
On 4/18/15, Antony Stone wrote: > On Saturday 18 April 2015 at 17:16:40 (EU time), Michael Williamson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have another question. >> >> It appears to me that spamassassin can produce different spam scores >> for the same email. > > Do you mean *exactly* the same email - totally

Re: spam score question

2015-04-18 Thread Antony Stone
On Saturday 18 April 2015 at 17:16:40 (EU time), Michael Williamson wrote: > Hi, > > I have another question. > > It appears to me that spamassassin can produce different spam scores > for the same email. Do you mean *exactly* the same email - totally identical headers and body, with no change

spam score question

2015-04-18 Thread Michael Williamson
Hi, I have another question. It appears to me that spamassassin can produce different spam scores for the same email. In particular, I have noticed that points are omitted for RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS (Spamhaus blacklist) sometimes. Why? Is the difference due to a difference in how spamassassin is invoked

Re: spam score question

2006-09-16 Thread jdow
From: "Jim Knuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Heute (17.09.2006/06:46 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea, Jim Knuth wrote: How can I find out, which is my trusted network? By reading the documentation and comparing it with your network config? :) Is this my Server IP address or 127.0.0.0 or wha

Re: spam score question

2006-09-16 Thread jdow
From: "Dhaval Patel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dhaval Patel wrote: > I hope that I am asking for this kind of help in the right place. > > I always look into why any spam got into my Inbox and found the reasons for this > message troubling. I use spam

Re: spam score question

2006-09-16 Thread Jim Knuth
Heute (17.09.2006/06:46 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea, > Jim Knuth wrote: >> How can I find out, which is my trusted network? > By reading the documentation and comparing it with your network config? :) >> Is this my Server IP address or 127.0.0.0 or what? ;) > Any IP that appears in your r

Re: spam score question

2006-09-16 Thread Dhaval Patel
"Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Dhaval Patel wrote: > > I hope that I am asking for this kind of help in the right place. > > > > I always look into why any spam got into my Inbox and found the reasons for > > this > > message troubling. I use spamc in the maildrop rule but I p

Re: spam score question

2006-09-16 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Jim Knuth wrote: How can I find out, which is my trusted network? By reading the documentation and comparing it with your network config? :) Is this my Server IP address or 127.0.0.0 or what? ;) Any IP that appears in your received headers from your MX all the way to the machine running

Re: spam score question

2006-09-16 Thread Jim Knuth
Heute (17.09.2006/06:20 Uhr) schrieb Daryl C. W. O'Shea, > Dhaval Patel wrote: >> I hope that I am asking for this kind of help in the right place. >> >> I always look into why any spam got into my Inbox and found the reasons for >> this message >> troubling. I use spamc in the maildrop rule but

Re: spam score question

2006-09-16 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Dhaval Patel wrote: I hope that I am asking for this kind of help in the right place. I always look into why any spam got into my Inbox and found the reasons for this message troubling. I use spamc in the maildrop rule but I put that message through spamassassin -t -D and get the same score so