Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2019-08-27 01:40:
I believe you will find lazy domain security rules in KAM.cf that can
help with this. ?all, for example, is lazy SPF.
added whole kam.cf now, one problem solved another created :=)
Aug 28 00:05:23.366 [7470] info: rules: meta test JMQ_CONGRAT has
Is it the spam coming as a empty subject, empty message and a pdf
attachment ?
I received about 3000 of them in the weekend and I'm starting to check the
logs of yesterday.
A lot of them got an high score, from 8 to 13 thanks to RBL...
score=9.692 required=5.6 tests=[BAYES_60=1.5,
I believe you will find lazy domain security rules in KAM.cf that can
help with this. ?all, for example, is lazy SPF.
On 8/26/2019 19:20, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> i see that bitcoins phinshing is trying to make use of not dkim signed
> and use domains without spf, sounds silly and maybe its just
i see that bitcoins phinshing is trying to make use of not dkim signed
and use domains without spf, sounds silly and maybe its just not
detected yet anywhre, problem is as example
From: "nets kundeservice"
how to block this if its not dkim signed ?
same for spf, is it just checking spf none
