Re: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:32:13 +, Les Mikesell wrote: ... > Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the > difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks > complete revisions although sometimes it might generate or store > differences for some operations

Re: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:32:13 +, Les Mikesell wrote: > ... >> Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the >> difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks >> complete revisions although sometime

RE: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Bob Archer
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: > > On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:32:13 +, Les Mikesell wrote: > > ... > >> Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the > >> difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks > >> complete revisions altho

Re: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-18 Thread
On 05/13/2013 06:23 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: No, the basic difference is that VCS operating on the whole tree can only have branches (and thus merge info) on the whole tree either, so you*can't* go like subversion does and map branches into the tree and need to have them (and tags) as a separate

Re: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-18 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Zé, am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 18:24 schrieben Sie: > The only difference between subversion and other SCM systems > is that other systems offer support for labeling and adding useful info > to those revisions, while Subversion doesn't. Which useful info besides the name, and always pr

Re: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-18 Thread
On 05/18/2013 06:33 PM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: Guten Tag Zé, am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 18:24 schrieben Sie: The only difference between subversion and other SCM systems is that other systems offer support for labeling and adding useful info to those revisions, while Subversion doesn't. Wh

Re: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-18 Thread Daniel Shahaf
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 07:33:10PM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > ... > > Let's put it this way: if that was actually a tag then it could also be > > argued that any file system supports branching/tagging. > > You ignore the versioning part of Subversion and that it guarantees > the state/histo

Re: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-19 Thread Les Mikesell
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Zé wrote: > >> Besides >> that, from my understanding filesystems do provide something which >> could be argued as support for branches and tags because branches are >> simply just work on something based on something other, which is >> implemented as copying files