ker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:43 PM
> > To: Tapestry users
> > Subject: Re: .jwc-file-free components for libraries (4.1.1)
> >
> > My recent experience (with 4.1.1) is that injecting relative
> > resources isn't wor
y.
Marcus
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Shucker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:43 PM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: .jwc-file-free components for libraries (4.1.1)
>
> My recent experience (with 4.1.1) is that injecting re
TECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:43 PM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: .jwc-file-free components for libraries (4.1.1)
>
> My recent experience (with 4.1.1) is that injecting relative
> resources isn't working. I have a few components in a
> library with
My recent experience (with 4.1.1) is that injecting relative resources
isn't working. I have a few components in a library with associated
*.script files. Some have templates and use the @Script tag in the
template. Others don't have templates and use the @InjectScript
annotation. I tried t
I do remember being annoyed by this lately, if you file a jira issue
for it I'll fix it quickly.
On 4/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are trying to move a little library of ours to Java-5 with full usage
of annotations, without jwc-files. While a component itself is
recogni
We are trying to move a little library of ours to Java-5 with full usage
of annotations, without jwc-files. While a component itself is
recognised this way. Asset-resolution relative to the (non-existing)
specification doesn't work.
Did I overlook anything? Or would that be an improvement-issue in
