RE: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4

2006-09-01 Thread James Carman
: Friday, September 01, 2006 7:36 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4 I meant the "direct" part not the "engine-service:" part. Cheers, On 9/1/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's a HiveMind object provi

RE: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4

2006-09-01 Thread James Carman
stry users' Subject: RE: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4 It's a HiveMind object provider. http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/hivedocs/service/tapestry.serv ices.EngineServiceObjectProvider.html -Original Message- From: Hajaansh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4

2006-09-01 Thread Hajaansh
tProvider.html -Original Message- From: Hajaansh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 7:21 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4 Perfect. Where did you find that the name for the engine service was engine-service:direct ? On 9/1/0

Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4

2006-09-01 Thread Brian Long
From the tapestry users mailing list, where else . . . ! /Brian. On 9/1/06, Hajaansh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Perfect. Where did you find that the name for the engine service was engine-service:direct ? On 9/1/06, Brian Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hajaansh, > > had the same prob

RE: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4

2006-09-01 Thread James Carman
t: Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4 Perfect. Where did you find that the name for the engine service was engine-service:direct ? On 9/1/06, Brian Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hajaansh, > > had the same problem myself when moving from 3 to 4, so here are the >

Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4

2006-09-01 Thread Hajaansh
Perfect. Where did you find that the name for the engine service was engine-service:direct ? On 9/1/06, Brian Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hajaansh, had the same problem myself when moving from 3 to 4, so here are the updated AreaLink.jwc and AreaLink.java that I use. The main difference

Re: DirectArea component in Tapestry 4

2006-09-01 Thread Brian Long
Hajaansh, had the same problem myself when moving from 3 to 4, so here are the updated AreaLink.jwc and AreaLink.java that I use. The main difference in the use of property injection for the engine service. AreaLink.jwc http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/dtd/Tapestry_4_0.dtd";> Creates a

DirectArea component in Tapestry 4

2006-09-01 Thread Hajaansh
I was wondering how to make a DirectArea component (getting callbacks on Image Maps) for Tapestry 4 as the implementation for Tapestry 3 does not work in Tapestry 4. And clues? I was looking at using the ILinkRenderer but to be honest I am just getting in a muddle. Cheers, Hajaash