Re: Dynamically loading a component

2010-10-06 Thread Omar Carvajal
e - > From: "Omar Carvajal" > To: "Tapestry users" > Sent: Tuesday, 5 October, 2010 07:19:27 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, > Bucharest, Istanbul > Subject: Re: Dynamically loading a component > > This is horrible news since I have no way of knowing the co

Re: Dynamically loading a component

2010-10-05 Thread P . Stavrinides
s" Sent: Tuesday, 5 October, 2010 07:19:27 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest, Istanbul Subject: Re: Dynamically loading a component This is horrible news since I have no way of knowing the components that needs to be called at design time (other wise I would use a ). There is no magic

Re: Dynamically loading a component

2010-10-05 Thread Kristian Marinkovic
possible combinations. for more details take a look at the BeanEditor implementation. g, kris Von:Omar Carvajal An: Tapestry users Datum: 05.10.2010 06:19 Betreff:Re: Dynamically loading a component This is horrible news since I have no way of knowing the components that

Re: Dynamically loading a component

2010-10-04 Thread Omar Carvajal
This is horrible news since I have no way of knowing the components that needs to be called at design time (other wise I would use a ). There is no magic that can be done to achieve this at all? Even if I have to use the internal services. Thanks for your quick response. Omar On Oct 4, 2010,

Re: Dynamically loading a component

2010-10-04 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:35:38 -0300, Omar Carvajal wrote: Hey all, Hi! I am trying to dynamically load a component which must be determined at run time, I figured I must use a t:delegate to render the component. On the Java side of things I cannot figure out how to instantiate the actual c

Dynamically loading a component

2010-10-04 Thread Omar Carvajal
Hey all, I am trying to dynamically load a component which must be determined at run time, I figured I must use a t:delegate to render the component. On the Java side of things I cannot figure out how to instantiate the actual component. I saw the @Component annotation with the "type" parameter b