-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lb,
lightbulb432 wrote:
>
>> Don't forget that you can't be stateless if you
>> need logins of some type (unless you use BASIC auth, which looks ugly
>> from a user point of view).
>
> Why is this? Others who answered to this thread and discussions
on for high-availability sites?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-OT--Session-replication-vs-stateless-tf4325727.html#a12369222
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To star
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lb,
lightbulb432 wrote:
> Let me see if I have my options straight - stateless app tier and no session
> affinity, or stateful app tier (i.e. HttpSessions) with session affinity?
That sounds about right. Don't forget that you can't be stateless if yo
GP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFGz0z39CaO5/Lv0PARAr9OAKCiB/sk56z7e4kBkPoqHL7QI8wv+ACeO9AA
> rsWsRUE4t5JhIbB+dSyS9kg=
> =Wypn
> -END PGP SIGNATU
On 8/24/07, lightbulb432 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although the debate between session replication vs stateless can't be
> definitively solved and depends on the application, I'd like to hear about
> your experiences with both. How are you designing your current applications,
> and what implicat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lightbulb,
lightbulb432 wrote:
> How are you designing your current applications, and what
> implications has the choice that you might not have expected - would
> you do anything differently if you could?
(For the record, I am not using session repl
at it the wrong way, because it not, I'm not really liking the
session replication idea if I'm decreasing hardware usage by half.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-OT--Session-replication-vs-stateless-tf4325727.html#a12319704
S
;
> With session replication between 2 machines, are you effectively reducing
> the capacity of each server, at least in terms of memory, by 50%?
> Hopefully
> I'm looking at it the wrong way, because it not, I'm not really liking the
> session replication idea if I'
essage in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-OT--Session-replication-vs-stateless-tf4325727.html#a12319704
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
