Yeah. It's a bit nasty, but there's not really any other way to have both
the flexibility and the convenience, unless you have some brilliant other
idea?
It's like jk says, normally you would use the setter, unless you need
on-demand evaluation per page-view.
Regards,
Alastair
On Thu, Apr 3, 20
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 03:50:42PM +0100, Charlie Dobbie wrote:
> Off Topic, but does anyone else apart from Scott and me get confused by this
> duality?
>
> Should I setProperty, or override getProperty? And the equally annoying
> Does getComponentX give me a reference to an already-created Comp
Off Topic, but does anyone else apart from Scott and me get confused by this
duality?
Should I setProperty, or override getProperty? And the equally annoying
Does getComponentX give me a reference to an already-created ComponentX, or
do I override it to supply my own ComponentX?
Charlie.
On T
Ryan Gravener wrote:
You can try wicket:container
...
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html#Wicket%2527sXHTMLtags-WicketTags
And that's even better. No ugly tags in the markup either.
Thanks Jeremy and Ryan for your quick responses.
-- Scott
--
Jeremy Levy wrote:
Did you try setRenderBodyOnly(true) ?
D'Oh! No, I was looking to subclass and override getRenderBodyOnly().
Sheer brilliance!
-- Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional command
You can try wicket:container
...
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/wickets-xhtml-tags.html#Wicket%2527sXHTMLtags-WicketTags
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking to do exactly what was discussed in a thread a few years ago
> (http://tinyurl.com/
Did you try setRenderBodyOnly(true) ?
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Scott Sauyet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm looking to do exactly what was discussed in a thread a few years
> ago (http://tinyurl.com/3yo43s), namely to dynamically include or exclude
> a group of tags.
>
> I can wrap
Hi, I'm looking to do exactly what was discussed in a thread a few years
ago (http://tinyurl.com/3yo43s), namely to dynamically include or
exclude a group of tags.
I can wrap them in a with a WebMarkupContainer, but I like to
have valid HTML and really don't want the tag in the final
outpu
