Kristian Lyngstol writes:
> The previous plugin wasn't horribly big and it would've been more work to
> re-factor it the way we wanted it. It simply didn't strike me that it would
> be an issue replacing it. Or that I had to discuss it with you.
That seems to be the MO these days at RL. "To hel
>Kristian Lyngstol writes:
>> The previous plugin wasn't horribly big and it would've been more work to
>> re-factor it the way we wanted it. It simply didn't strike me that it would
>> be an issue replacing it. Or that I had to discuss it with you.
>That seems to be the MO these days at RL. "T
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:03:07PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Norman Leutner writes:
> > [to Kristian Lyngstol]
> > Your're the one who wrote that plugin...
>
> I was about to say "no, that was me" - then I found out that my code had
> been replaced.
>
> Kristian, what was wrong with th
