This is a problem I'm increasingly stuggling with as I have more and
more git repositories, that were converted from old subversion
repositories etc. How do I make sure I don't accidentially delete a
repository that has historical data I will want later? How do I know
which historical repository to
Ha, i'm about to break your moral. I'm looking at moving from my own
Subversion server (mostly b/c it's become a pain to manage from behind ISP
dynamic DNS and I don't need a server running all the time) to the hosted
service at rsync.net.
Soo, there are some image and data files from old project
martin f krafft writes:
> also sprach chombee [2010.03.10.1822 +0100]:
>> I'm sure everyone already has their own one of these, but I just wanted
>> to post my dotfile manager:
>>
>> http://github.com/seanh/dotfilemanager
>>
>> I've been using it for a while now and it seems to work well, I've
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:50:01PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > I think the killer point is that you can remove a file from the
> > .config directory and detect dangling symlinks, while you wouldn't
> > be able to tell a dangling hard link apart from an untracked
> > config file.
>
> Oh, but
I kept all my files in a git repo. Eventually the repo got too big to
handle. I archived the .git file and started afresh with git init. Now
I'm looking at some really old work (from a couple of years back), from
my notes I can't figure out some exact details that I need, and the
history of my git
also sprach Pavel Avgustinov [2010.03.11.1322 +0100]:
> >From what I can see, the host-specific linking (i.e. prefer
> >a file with suffix "__foo" on host foo).
I wonder whether this isn't something for VCS branches anyway
> > Similarly, I wonder why people use symlinks instead of
> > hardlinks.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:02:23 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> I wonder what these offer that GNU stow or xstow couldn't do.
I never thought of using stow for that before, so thanks for
mentioning it.
There are probably some benefits to having a specialized tool that does
not require extensive cu
On Thursday 11 March 2010 12:02:23 martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach chombee [2010.03.10.1822 +0100]:
> > I'm sure everyone already has their own one of these, but I just wanted
> > to post my dotfile manager:
> >
> > http://github.com/seanh/dotfilemanager
> >
> > I've been using it for a while
also sprach chombee [2010.03.10.1822 +0100]:
> I'm sure everyone already has their own one of these, but I just wanted
> to post my dotfile manager:
>
> http://github.com/seanh/dotfilemanager
>
> I've been using it for a while now and it seems to work well, I've
> ironed out a couple of bugs tha
