Re: [vdr] Re: vdr doesn't recognise some remote keys when using LIRC

2007-03-17 Thread Tony Houghton
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > On 6 Mar 2007, at 11:44, Torgeir Veimo wrote: > > >I'm using a lirc setup with inputlircd daemon with a hauppauge > >remote on a dvb card. Everything works with the remote plugins > >using /dev/input/eventX, but I'm trying to share the remote

Re: [vdr] Hard link cutter [was: Suggestion: High speed cutting]

2007-03-17 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Richard Lithvall wrote: > Why not just change the naming of video files to four, five or even > eight digits? The problem is not the file name, it's the index file. An index entry stores the file number as "uchar", which allows 256 recording files. Bye. -- Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Reinhard Nissl

Re: [vdr] softdevice audio problem. audio repacker issue?

2007-03-17 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Martin Wache wrote: >>> Is there a reason why the cAudioRepacker is used in transfer mode and >>> during recordings, but not while replaying? >> >> Well, when cAudioRepacker was active while recording, then there is no >> need for it when replaying such a recording. > > Wouldn't it make more

Re: [vdr] softdevice audio problem. audio repacker issue?

2007-03-17 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Saturday 17 March 2007 22:05, Martin Wache wrote: > I attached a patch with make the softdevice use av_read_frame(), it has > still some issues, but it solves the problems Stefan reports. Martin, thats really great. Thank you. This solves the issue I had with playback of some old recordings. B

Re: [vdr] softdevice audio problem. audio repacker issue?

2007-03-17 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Saturday 17 March 2007 23:11, Martin Wache wrote: > Hi, > > > Reinhard Nissl schrieb: > > > And old recordings will > > vanish as time passes by. > > > I don't buy this argument. I know that there are VDR users with large > archives of recordings, do you want to tell them that they can't us

Re: [vdr] softdevice audio problem. audio repacker issue?

2007-03-17 Thread Stefan Lucke
On Saturday 17 March 2007 20:57, Reinhard Nissl wrote: > Hi, > > Stefan Lucke wrote: > > > Dumping the first 16 bytes of audio packets we get, shows the following: > > ff fc a4 0d b6 64 88 55 33 65 56 54 44 21 33 33 > > ff fc a4 0d 54 6a 88 65 33 44 56 54 33 33 33 33 > > ff fc a4 0d 02 a4 88 55 3

[vdr] Re: vdr doesn't recognise some remote keys when using LIRC

2007-03-17 Thread Torgeir Veimo
On 6 Mar 2007, at 11:44, Torgeir Veimo wrote: I'm using a lirc setup with inputlircd daemon with a hauppauge remote on a dvb card. Everything works with the remote plugins using /dev/input/eventX, but I'm trying to share the remote with several applications. For some reason when trying t

Re: [vdr] Hard link cutter [was: Suggestion: High speed cutting]

2007-03-17 Thread Richard Lithvall
Udo Richter wrote: This has been in my mind for over two years, and now I just wanted to see it working: Using hard file system links to speed up editing whenever a 00x.vdr file is copied from source to destination recording without modification. This has crossed my mind several times as well

Re: [vdr] softdevice audio problem. audio repacker issue?

2007-03-17 Thread Martin Wache
Hi, Reinhard Nissl schrieb: > Hi, > > Martin Wache wrote: > >> Is there a reason why the cAudioRepacker is used in transfer mode and >> during recordings, but not while replaying? > > Well, when cAudioRepacker was active while recording, then there is no > need for it when replaying such a rec

Re: [vdr] softdevice audio problem. audio repacker issue?

2007-03-17 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Martin Wache wrote: > Is there a reason why the cAudioRepacker is used in transfer mode and > during recordings, but not while replaying? Well, when cAudioRepacker was active while recording, then there is no need for it when replaying such a recording. And old recordings will vanish as time

Re: [vdr] softdevice audio problem. audio repacker issue?

2007-03-17 Thread Martin Wache
Reinhard Nissl schrieb: > Hi, > > Stefan Lucke wrote: > >> Dumping the first 16 bytes of audio packets we get, shows the following: >> ff fc a4 0d b6 64 88 55 33 65 56 54 44 21 33 33 >> ff fc a4 0d 54 6a 88 65 33 44 56 54 33 33 33 33 >> ff fc a4 0d 02 a4 88 55 33 54 66 44 43 33 33 33 >> 99 77 1b

[vdr] deleting empty directories on a samba shared drive

2007-03-17 Thread Peter Sulatycke
I have two samba shared video drives on my vdr system. Everything works great except empty directories are not erased on these drives. They are erased on my Linux drives. I can manually erase directories on these drivers with rmdir under Linux. There does appear to be any permission errors. Th

Re: [vdr] softdevice audio problem. audio repacker issue?

2007-03-17 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Stefan Lucke wrote: > Dumping the first 16 bytes of audio packets we get, shows the following: > ff fc a4 0d b6 64 88 55 33 65 56 54 44 21 33 33 > ff fc a4 0d 54 6a 88 65 33 44 56 54 33 33 33 33 > ff fc a4 0d 02 a4 88 55 33 54 66 44 43 33 33 33 > 99 77 1b e6 34 b2 5f 41 e8 5b 90 a9 d2 04 24 5

[vdr] softdevice audio problem. audio repacker issue?

2007-03-17 Thread Stefan Lucke
Hi, need some help in locating a decoding issue with old vdr recordings and softdevice. Recordings were done with vdr-1.2.1. They play fine when using ffplay . They play fine when using ffmpeg svn revision 6040 via vdr + softdevice. With vdr + softdevice there is no sound in ffmpeg svn rev 6147

[vdr] Hard link cutter [was: Suggestion: High speed cutting]

2007-03-17 Thread Udo Richter
Udo Richter wrote: I've been thinking about video cutting strategies, and I think its possible to speed up the cutting process noticeable, with some modifications to VDR. Hi list, I just had to do this in self-reply. ;) For reference, this is my 'original' post: http://linvdr.org/mailinglists

[vdr] vdr-1.5.1: Interface race

2007-03-17 Thread Stefan Huelswitt
Hi, there is a race condition while terminating vdr. Early in the shutdown process the Interface class is deleted. If a signal is raised after that point, the signal handler will call Interface->Interrupt() which is allready deleted. Regards. -- Stefan Huelswitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.