[vdr] compiling dxr3 plugin against vdr-1.5.11

2007-11-14 Thread YUP
Hi, Did anybody try to compile dxr3 plugin from source from e-tobi repositories against 1.5.11 tree? Any luck? Regards, Y. ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr

Re: [vdr] next features ? Was: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread rjkm
Klaus Schmidinger writes: > On 11/14/07 17:24, Lauri Tischler wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> "Graziano Pavone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> [...] > >>> And you wouldn't mind applying a huge patch on VDR to achieve this > >>> goal? > >>> > >>> This feature is so inte

Re: [vdr] next features?

2007-11-14 Thread Reinhard Nissl
Hi, Klaus Schmidinger schrieb: > H.264 will only become interesting (to me) once there are hardware > devices that can replay it (aka "Full Featured DVB cards"). > I am not interested in software players that might not even run > on my 450 MHz VDR. > > Until then, normal MPEG2/DVB-S does just fi

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 01:52:28PM +0100, alexw wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 13:19:39 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 03:41:05PM +0100, alexw wrote: > > > On Tuesday 13 November 2007 15:16:32 Graziano Pavone wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Using my PS3 as a vdr

Re: [vdr] dxr3 and 1.5.11 antialiasing

2007-11-14 Thread Luca Olivetti
El Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:38:39 +0100 Jan Willies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Luca Olivetti wrote: > > FWIW I have 2.3.1 (the version that came with mandriva 2007.1). > > Seems that debian only has Version: 2.3.5-1+b1 and Version: > 2.2.1-5+etch1. Unfortunately, 2.2.1 seems pretty old when try

Re: [vdr] next features ? Was: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread Lauri Tischler
Klaus Schmidinger wrote: > On 11/14/07 17:24, Lauri Tischler wrote: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> "Graziano Pavone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>> [...] And you wouldn't mind applying a huge patch on VDR to achieve this goal? This feature is so interesting that I cer

Re: [vdr] next features ? Was: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 11/14/07 17:57, VDR User wrote: > On Nov 14, 2007 8:36 AM, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> H.264 will only become interesting (to me) once there are hardware >> devices that can replay it (aka "Full Featured DVB cards"). >> I am not interested in software players that might not e

Re: [vdr] next features ? Was: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread VDR User
On Nov 14, 2007 8:36 AM, Klaus Schmidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > H.264 will only become interesting (to me) once there are hardware > devices that can replay it (aka "Full Featured DVB cards"). > I am not interested in software players that might not even run > on my 450 MHz VDR. > > Until t

Re: [vdr] next features ? Was: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread Klaus Schmidinger
On 11/14/07 17:24, Lauri Tischler wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> "Graziano Pavone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> [...] >>> And you wouldn't mind applying a huge patch on VDR to achieve this goal? >>> >>> This feature is so interesting that I certainly wouldn't mind, even if it >>> wou

Re: [vdr] next features ? Was: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread Lauri Tischler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "Graziano Pavone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] >> And you wouldn't mind applying a huge patch on VDR to achieve this goal? >> >> This feature is so interesting that I certainly wouldn't mind, even if it >> would a very good feature to be included in the 1.5

Re: [vdr] next features ? Was: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread VDR User
On Nov 14, 2007 4:23 AM, Gregoire Favre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would love to have VDR support H.264 recording on DVB-S. I know a lot of people, including myself, who agree! ___ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mail

Re: [vdr] dxr3 and 1.5.11 antialiasing

2007-11-14 Thread Jan Willies
Luca Olivetti wrote: > En/na Jan Willies ha escrit: > >> After upgrading from 1.5.2 to 1.5.11 I ran into some problems with my >> dxr3 card. The first one was solved by setting AntiAlias = 0 in >> setup.conf. But after that, VDR won't even start: >> >> vdr: [3936] ERROR: FreeType: error during F

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread alexw
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 13:19:39 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 03:41:05PM +0100, alexw wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 November 2007 15:16:32 Graziano Pavone wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Using my PS3 as a vdr client is also my target. But I experienced bad > > > > (de-)inter

Re: [vdr] next features ? Was: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread Gregoire Favre
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:49:50AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > imho that's a feature that must be in 1.5 ! > as with the smart channel management. > > utf8 and subtitles are great achievements, what's next ? :-) I would love to have VDR support H.264 recording on DVB-S. -- Grégoire FAVRE

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 03:41:05PM +0100, alexw wrote: > On Tuesday 13 November 2007 15:16:32 Graziano Pavone wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Using my PS3 as a vdr client is also my target. But I experienced bad > > > (de-)interlacing when watching SD TV using SD output (even with right > > > resoluti

[vdr] next features ? Was: [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread syrius . ml
"Graziano Pavone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > And you wouldn't mind applying a huge patch on VDR to achieve this goal? > > This feature is so interesting that I certainly wouldn't mind, even if it > would a very good feature to be included in the 1.5 vdr release... :) imho that's a fe

Re: [vdr] [ANNOUNCE] vdr-xine-0.8.0 plugin

2007-11-14 Thread Graziano Pavone
Hi Reinhard 2007/11/13, Reinhard Nissl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Are there any problems in submitting the needed patch to the mainstream > > xine-lib distribution? > > The problem is that small parts of the patch would break binary > compatibility in xine-lib-1.1.x. This is no problem if a distrib